Ambrazaitis Gilbert
Institute of Phonetics and Digital Speech Processing (IPDS), University of Kiel, Germany.
Phonetica. 2005 Apr-Dec;62(2-4):196-214. doi: 10.1159/000090098. Epub 2005 Dec 29.
This study investigates an intonation contour of German whose status has not been established yet: a globally falling contour with a slight rise at the very end of the phrase (FSR). The contour may be said to lie on a phonetic continuum between falling (F) and falling-rising (FR) contours. It is hypothesized that F, FR and FSR differ with respect to their communicative functions: F is terminal, FR is non-terminal, and FSR is pseudo-terminal, respectively. The hypotheses were tested in two steps. First, measurements in a labelled corpus of spontaneous speech provided the necessary background information on the phonetics of the contours. In the second step, the general hypothesis was approached in a perceptual experiment using the paradigm of a semantic differential: 49 listeners judged 17 systematically generated stimuli on nine semantic scales, such as 'impolite/polite'. The hypotheses were generally confirmed. Both F and FSR were associated with a conclusive statement, while FR was more likely to be judged as marking a question. FSR differs from F in that it does not express features such as categoricalness, dominance or impoliteness. The results are interpreted as an instance of the frequency code: the addition of a slight rise means avoidance of extremely low F(0); the functional consequence is a reduction of communicated dominance.
本研究调查了一种德语语调轮廓,其地位尚未确定:一种整体下降的轮廓,在短语结尾处有轻微上升(FSR)。可以说这种轮廓位于降调(F)和降升调(FR)轮廓之间的语音连续体上。据推测,F、FR和FSR在交际功能方面存在差异:F表示终结,FR表示非终结,而FSR分别表示准终结。这些假设分两步进行了检验。首先,在一个标注的自然言语语料库中进行测量,提供了关于这些轮廓语音学的必要背景信息。在第二步中,采用语义差异范式,通过感知实验来探讨一般假设:49名听众在九个语义量表上对17个系统生成的刺激进行判断,例如“不礼貌/礼貌”。这些假设总体上得到了证实。F和FSR都与确定性陈述相关,而FR更有可能被判断为标记一个问题。FSR与F的不同之处在于它不表达诸如绝对、主导或不礼貌等特征。这些结果被解释为频率编码的一个实例:轻微上升的添加意味着避免极低的F(0);其功能后果是减少传达的主导性。