• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Will stent revascularization replace coronary artery bypass grafting?

作者信息

Wilson James M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 2012;39(6):856-9.

PMID:23304036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3528239/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Will stent revascularization replace coronary artery bypass grafting?支架血管重建术会取代冠状动脉搭桥术吗？
Tex Heart Inst J. 2012;39(6):856-9.
2
Five-year follow-up of drug-eluting stents implantation vs minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery disease: a propensity score analysis.药物洗脱支架置入术与微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左前降支病变的 5 年随访：倾向评分分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Nov;44(5):884-90. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt137. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
3
[Short-term follow-up results of hybrid coronary revascularization by robotic coronary artery bypass grafting and stent implantation].[机器人冠状动脉搭桥术与支架植入杂交冠状动脉血运重建的短期随访结果]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2015 Aug;35(8):1166-9.
4
State-of-the-Art Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Patient Selection, Graft Selection, and Optimizing Outcomes.冠状动脉搭桥术的最新进展：患者选择、移植物选择及优化治疗效果
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 Apr;8(2):173-198. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
5
Propensity score-matched analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting versus second-generation drug-eluting stents for triple-vessel disease.三血管病变患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与第二代药物洗脱支架的倾向性评分匹配分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;55(6):1152-1159. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy415.
6
Unusual treatment of coronary artery aneurysm.冠状动脉瘤的特殊治疗。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Aug;9(8):864-5. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3282f42bd8.
7
[Biosoluble coronary stents].[生物可溶冠状动脉支架]
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 2013 May-Jun(3):55-60.
8
[Surgical treatment of a patient with coronary artery disease combined with stenosis of the left subclavian artery].[冠状动脉疾病合并左锁骨下动脉狭窄患者的外科治疗]
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2016;22(2):118-21.
9
Comparison of outcomes in patients undergoing coronary bypass of patent versus restenosed bare metal stented coronary arteries.接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者中，通畅与再狭窄的裸金属支架冠状动脉搭桥术后结果比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Nov 15;96(10):1416-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.089. Epub 2005 Sep 29.
10
Left Main Disease: What Is the Correct Approach to Revascularization?左主干病变：血运重建的正确方法是什么？
Cardiol Rev. 2018 Sep/Oct;26(5):219-229. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000213.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk-prediction models for mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery: application to individual patients.冠状动脉旁路手术后死亡率的风险预测模型：应用于个体患者。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Jun 2;149(2):227-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
2
Diabetic and nondiabetic patients with left main and/or 3-vessel coronary artery disease: comparison of outcomes with cardiac surgery and paclitaxel-eluting stents.左主干和/或 3 支血管病变的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者：心脏手术与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗结果的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 16;55(11):1067-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.057. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
3
The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease.SYNTAX评分：一种对冠状动脉疾病复杂性进行分级的血管造影工具。
EuroIntervention. 2005 Aug;1(2):219-27.
4
Predicting major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention: the Texas Heart Institute risk score.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要不良心脏事件的预测：德州心脏研究所风险评分
Am Heart J. 2008 Jun;155(6):1068-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.034. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
5
Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?药物洗脱支架会取代冠状动脉搭桥手术吗？
Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(3):323-30.
6
Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation.冠状动脉旁路移植术与支架植入术的长期疗效
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 26;352(21):2174-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040316.
7
Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial.多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥手术与冠状动脉支架植入术对比（支架或手术试验）：一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2002 Sep 28;360(9338):965-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11078-6.
8
Coronary artery bypass surgery versus coronary stenting: risk-adjusted survival rates in 5,619 patients.冠状动脉搭桥手术与冠状动脉支架置入术：5619例患者的风险调整生存率
Tex Heart Inst J. 2002;29(1):3-9.
9
Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease.冠状动脉搭桥手术与支架置入术治疗多支血管病变的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Apr 12;344(15):1117-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104123441502.
10
Impact of the "stent-when-feasible" policy on in-hospital and 6-month success and complication rates after coronary angioplasty: single-center experience with 17,956 revascularization procedures (1993-1997).“可行时植入支架”策略对冠状动脉血管成形术后住院期间及6个月成功率和并发症发生率的影响：17956例血运重建手术的单中心经验（1993 - 1997年）
Tex Heart Inst J. 2000;27(4):337-45.