Voelter-Mahlknecht S, Krummenauer F, Koulele D, Mahlknecht U, Escobar Pinzón L C, Dupuis H, Letzel S
Department of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University of Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 May;79(5):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0070-7. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
In order to establish an international standard of cold provocation test in the assessment of vibration-induced white finger (VWF) disease, an ISO-working group tentatively created the DIN ISO 14835-1. Based on this new standard, previously existing testing conditions had to be modified. Since a comparison of current and previous evaluation procedures is necessary for both the individual assessment and the performance of metaanalyses, the revision and validation of criteria for the examination of the cold provocation tests are appropriate and necessary.
Twenty-one individuals suffering from VWF disease whose disorder was accepted as an occupational disease underwent the cold provocation test on two successive days following a 2- and a 5-min-long exposure to the cold. As a benchmark for classification as 'normal' or 'pathological', the 15-min mark after a 2-min-long exposure was chosen. A skin temperature of 28 degrees C was selected for discrimination between 'non-pathological' (at least 28 degrees C) and 'pathological' test results.
It could be shown, that exposures to cold water (12 degrees C) over 2 and 5 min lead to similar rewarming profiles, who differ in median systematically by 1 degrees C. A modification of the former classification rule should be considered. After a 5 min exposure, the classification criterion can be based on the temperature assessments measured after 20 min; alternatively the cut point can be reduced from 28 to 27 degrees C while maintaining the previous assessment time of t = 15 min.
The shown results represent the first attempt of modifying the previous classification criteria of the cold provocation test within the scope of the VWF disease. In view of the described problems of the study design there is no doubt that continuing modifications and their validation on the base of larger collectives groups are necessary.
为了在振动性白指(VWF)疾病评估中建立冷激发试验的国际标准,一个ISO工作组初步制定了DIN ISO 14835-1。基于这一新标准,以前的测试条件必须进行修改。由于个体评估和荟萃分析都需要对当前和以前的评估程序进行比较,因此修订和验证冷激发试验的检查标准是恰当且必要的。
21名被认定患有职业病的VWF疾病患者,在分别暴露于寒冷环境2分钟和5分钟后,连续两天接受冷激发试验。选择2分钟暴露后15分钟的时间点作为分类为“正常”或“病理”的基准。选择皮肤温度28摄氏度来区分“非病理”(至少28摄氏度)和“病理”测试结果。
可以看出,暴露于12摄氏度冷水中2分钟和5分钟会导致相似的复温曲线,其中位数系统地相差1摄氏度。应考虑修改以前的分类规则。暴露5分钟后,分类标准可以基于20分钟后测量的温度评估;或者在保持先前评估时间t = 15分钟的同时,将切点从28摄氏度降低到27摄氏度。
所示结果代表了在VWF疾病范围内首次尝试修改冷激发试验以前的分类标准。鉴于研究设计中所述的问题,毫无疑问,在更大的集体基础上继续进行修改及其验证是必要的。