Suppr超能文献

国家癌症护理质量倡议的结果:我们如何提高美国的癌症护理质量?

Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States?

作者信息

Malin Jennifer L, Schneider Eric C, Epstein Arnold M, Adams John, Emanuel Ezekiel J, Kahn Katherine L

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):626-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.3365. Epub 2006 Jan 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In 1999, the National Cancer Policy Board called attention to the quality of cancer care in the United States and recommended establishing a quality monitoring system with the capability of regularly reporting on the quality of care for patients with cancer.

METHODS

Using data from a patient survey 4 years after diagnosis and review of medical records, we determined the percentage of stage I to III breast cancer and stage II to III colorectal cancer survivors in five metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) across the United States who received recommended care specified by a comprehensive set of explicit quality measures.

RESULTS

Two thousand three hundred sixty-six (63%) of 3,775 eligible patients responded to the survey, and 85% consented to have their medical records reviewed. Our final analytic sample (n = 1,765) included 47% of the eligible patients. Patients with breast and colorectal cancer received 86% of recommended care (95% CI, 86% to 87%) and 78% of recommended care (95% CI, 77% to 79%), respectively. Adherence to quality measures was less than 85% for 18 of the 36 breast cancer measures, and significant variation across MSAs was observed for seven quality measures. The percent adherence was less than 85% for 14 of the 25 colorectal cancer measures, and one quality measure demonstrated statistically significant variation across the MSAs.

CONCLUSION

Initial management of patients with breast and colorectal cancer in the United States seemed consistent with evidence-based practice; however, substantial variation in adherence to some quality measures point to significant opportunities for improvement.

摘要

目的

1999年,国家癌症政策委员会提请人们关注美国癌症护理的质量,并建议建立一个能够定期报告癌症患者护理质量的质量监测系统。

方法

利用诊断后4年患者调查的数据以及病历审查结果,我们确定了美国五个大都市统计区(MSA)中接受一套全面明确质量指标所规定的推荐护理的I至III期乳腺癌幸存者和II至III期结直肠癌幸存者的比例。

结果

3775名符合条件的患者中有2366名(63%)回应了调查,85%的患者同意审查其病历。我们的最终分析样本(n = 1765)包括47%的符合条件的患者。乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者分别接受了86%(95%置信区间,86%至87%)和78%(95%置信区间,77%至79%)的推荐护理。36项乳腺癌指标中有18项的质量指标依从率低于85%,7项质量指标在各MSA之间存在显著差异。25项结直肠癌指标中有14项的依从率低于85%,一项质量指标在各MSA之间存在统计学上的显著差异。

结论

美国乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者的初始管理似乎与循证实践一致;然而,在某些质量指标的依从性方面存在很大差异,这表明有很大的改进空间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验