Romero Soledad, Delbello Melissa P, Soutullo Cesar A, Stanford Kevin, Strakowski Stephen M
Division of Bipolar Disorders Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2005 Dec;7(6):617-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2005.00270.x.
To compare family environmental characteristics of families with at least one bipolar parent and families with parents without any Axis I disorder.
Family environment of 24 families with at least one parent with bipolar disorder (BPD) and 27 families with healthy parents (healthy families, HF) were assessed using the Family Environment Scale (FES). We compared FES subscale scores between BPD and HF. We also compared FES normative scores with scores of BPD families.
Seventeen (71%) of the 24 BPD families had at least one child with a mood disorder and one (3.7%) of the 27 HF had a child with a mood disorder. Families with BPD reported lower cohesion (p = 0.009) and expressiveness (p = 0.03) scores compared with HF, after controlling for group socioeconomic status differences. Bilineal BPD families had higher cohesion scores than unilineal BPD families (p = 0.05). We found no significant differences in any subscales between BPD families with (n = 9) versus without (n = 15) children with BPD. Compared with normative FES data BPD families reported lower cohesion (C) (p = 0.02) and independence (IND) (p = 0.004) scores and higher conflict (CON) (p = 0.02), intellectual-cultural orientation (ICO) (p = 0.05), moral-religious emphasis (MRE) (p < 0.001) and control (CTL) (p < 0.001) scores.
Our results suggest that members of BPD families may have difficulty communicating effectively with one another, suggesting that interventions aimed at improving this may be beneficial to patients with BPD. Results suggest that the impact of different lifestyles in different communities may influence FES scores, and thus it is important to use demographically matched comparison groups.
比较至少有一位双相情感障碍患者的父母的家庭与父母无任何轴I障碍的家庭的家庭环境特征。
使用家庭环境量表(FES)对24个至少有一位患有双相情感障碍(BPD)的父母的家庭和27个父母健康的家庭(健康家庭,HF)的家庭环境进行评估。我们比较了BPD家庭和HF家庭的FES分量表得分。我们还将FES常模得分与BPD家庭的得分进行了比较。
24个BPD家庭中有17个(71%)至少有一个患有情绪障碍的孩子,27个HF家庭中有1个(3.7%)有一个患有情绪障碍的孩子。在控制了组间社会经济地位差异后,与HF家庭相比,BPD家庭报告的凝聚力(p = 0.009)和表达性(p = 0.03)得分较低。双亲BPD家庭的凝聚力得分高于单亲BPD家庭(p = 0.05)。我们发现有BPD患儿的BPD家庭(n = 9)和无BPD患儿的BPD家庭(n = 15)在任何分量表上均无显著差异。与FES常模数据相比,BPD家庭报告的凝聚力(C)(p = 0.02)和独立性(IND)(p = 0.004)得分较低,冲突(CON)(p = 0.02)、智力文化取向(ICO)(p = 0.05)、道德宗教强调(MRE)(p < 0.001)和控制性(CTL)(p < 0.001)得分较高。
我们的结果表明,BPD家庭的成员可能难以相互有效沟通,这表明旨在改善这一情况的干预措施可能对BPD患者有益。结果表明,不同社区不同生活方式的影响可能会影响FES得分,因此使用人口统计学匹配的对照组很重要。