Suppr超能文献

截瘫患者对臂部手摇和腿部电刺激骑行的心肺反应。

Cardiorespiratory responses to arm cranking and electrical stimulation leg cycling in people with paraplegia.

作者信息

Raymond J, Davis G M, Climstein M, Sutton J R

机构信息

Rehabilitation Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Jun;31(6):822-8. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199906000-00010.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the cardiorespiratory responses during arm exercise with and without concurrent electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling in people with paraplegia.

METHODS

On separate days, 10 subjects with spinal cord injuries (T5-T12) performed either arm cranking (ACE), or simultaneous arm cranking + electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling (ACE+ES-LCE) graded exercise tests.

RESULTS

During submaximal, steady-state exercise, ACE+ES-LCE elicited significantly higher VO2, (by 0.25-0.28 L x min(-1)) stroke volume (by 13 mL), and VE(BTPS) (by 9.4 L x min(-1)) compared with ACE alone. In contrast, there were no significant differences of submaximal HR, cardiac output, or power output between the exercise modes. At maximal exercise, ACE+ES-LCE elicited significantly higher VO2 (by 0.23 L x min(-1)) compared with ACE alone, but there were no differences in power output, HR, or VE(BTPS).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that during submaximal or maximal exercise there was a greater metabolic stress elicited during ACE+ES-LCE compared with during ACE alone. The higher stroke volume observed during submaximal ACE+ES-LCE, in the absence of any difference in HR, implied a reduced venous pooling and higher cardiac volume loading during ACE+ES-LCE. These results suggest that training incorporating ACE+ES-LCE may be more effective in improving aerobic fitness in people with paraplegia than ACE alone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估截瘫患者在进行手臂运动时,有无同时进行电刺激诱导的腿部骑行时的心肺反应。

方法

在不同日期,10名脊髓损伤(T5 - T12)患者分别进行了手臂曲柄运动(ACE)或同时进行手臂曲柄运动 + 电刺激诱导的腿部骑行(ACE + ES - LCE)分级运动测试。

结果

在次最大稳态运动期间,与单独的ACE相比,ACE + ES - LCE引起的VO2显著更高(增加0.25 - 0.28 L·min⁻¹)、每搏输出量更高(增加13 mL)和VE(BTPS)更高(增加9.4 L·min⁻¹)。相比之下,两种运动模式在次最大心率、心输出量或功率输出方面没有显著差异。在最大运动时,与单独的ACE相比,ACE + ES - LCE引起的VO2显著更高(增加0.23 L·min⁻¹),但在功率输出、心率或VE(BTPS)方面没有差异。

结论

这些结果表明,在次最大或最大运动期间,与单独的ACE相比,ACE + ES - LCE引起的代谢应激更大。在次最大ACE + ES - LCE期间观察到的更高每搏输出量,在心率无任何差异的情况下,意味着ACE + ES - LCE期间静脉血池减少且心脏容量负荷更高。这些结果表明,与单独的ACE相比,纳入ACE + ES - LCE的训练可能在改善截瘫患者的有氧适能方面更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验