de Lusignan Simon, Chan Tom, Theadom Alice, Dhoul Neil
Primary Care Informatics, Division of Community Health Sciences, Hunter Wing, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Apr;76(4):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.11.003. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
Routinely collected clinical data is increasingly used for health service management, audit, and research. Even apparently anonymised data are subject to data protection. The relevant principles were set out in a treaty of the Council of Europe and subsequent policy has been based on these. However, little has been written about implementing policy and the role of health informaticians in this process.
To define the elements of an effective implementation policy; the role of the health informatician in protecting processed clinical data.
We performed a literature review of bibliographic databases, a manual search of the major medical informatics associations' websites, relevant working groups and an affiliated journal. Fifty-four papers relevant to implementation were identified.
The effective implementation of policy requires consideration of technical, organisational, personnel and professional issues. However, there is no clearly defined formula for successful implementation of data protection policy.
Patients and professionals need a system they can trust, and processes that can be easily incorporated into everyday practice. The lack of a core generalisable theory or strong professional code in health informatics limits the ability of the health informaticians to implement policy.
常规收集的临床数据越来越多地用于卫生服务管理、审计和研究。即使是看似匿名的数据也受到数据保护。相关原则在欧洲理事会的一项条约中有所规定,随后的政策也以此为基础。然而,关于政策实施以及卫生信息学家在此过程中的作用,所撰写的内容较少。
界定有效实施政策的要素;卫生信息学家在保护处理后的临床数据方面的作用。
我们对书目数据库进行了文献综述,手动搜索了主要医学信息学协会的网站、相关工作组及一份附属期刊。共识别出54篇与实施相关的论文。
政策的有效实施需要考虑技术、组织、人员和专业问题。然而,对于数据保护政策的成功实施,并没有明确界定的公式。
患者和专业人员需要一个他们可以信任的系统,以及能够轻松融入日常实践的流程。卫生信息学缺乏核心的可推广理论或强有力的专业准则,限制了卫生信息学家实施政策的能力。