Mackinnon Dean F, Pies Ronald
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2006 Feb;8(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00283.x.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders guidelines provide only a partial solution to the nosology and treatment of bipolar disorder in that disorders with common symptoms and biological correlates may be categorized separately because of superficial differences related to behavior, life history, and temperament. The relationship is explored between extremely rapid switching forms of bipolar disorder, in which manic and depressive symptoms are either mixed or switch rapidly, and forms of borderline personality disorder in which affective lability is a prominent symptom.
A MedLine search was conducted of articles that focused on rapid cycling in bipolar disorder, emphasizing recent publications (2001-2004).
Studies examined here suggest a number of points of phenomenological and biological overlap between the affective lability criterion of borderline personality disorder and the extremely rapid cycling bipolar disorders. We propose a model for the development of 'borderline' behaviors on the basis of unstable mood states that sheds light on how the psychological and somatic interventions may be aimed at 'breaking the cycle' of borderline personality disorder development. A review of pharmacologic studies suggests that anticonvulsants may have similar stabilizing effects in both borderline personality disorder and rapid cycling bipolar disorder.
The same mechanism may drive both the rapid mood switching in some forms of bipolar disorder and the affective instability of borderline personality disorder and may even be rooted in the same genetic etiology. While continued clinical investigation of the use of anticonvulsants in borderline personality disorder is needed, anticonvulsants may be useful in the treatment of this condition, combined with appropriate psychotherapy.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》指南仅为双相情感障碍的分类学和治疗提供了部分解决方案,因为具有共同症状和生物学关联的疾病可能由于与行为、生活史和气质相关的表面差异而被分别归类。本研究探讨了双相情感障碍的极快速转换形式(其中躁狂和抑郁症状混合或快速转换)与边缘型人格障碍形式(其中情感不稳定是突出症状)之间的关系。
对聚焦于双相情感障碍快速循环的文章进行了医学在线数据库检索,重点关注近期出版物(2001 - 2004年)。
此处研究的各项研究表明,边缘型人格障碍的情感不稳定标准与极快速循环双相情感障碍之间在现象学和生物学上存在一些重叠点。我们基于不稳定情绪状态提出了一个“边缘型”行为发展模型,该模型阐明了心理和躯体干预如何可能旨在“打破”边缘型人格障碍发展的“循环”。对药理学研究的综述表明,抗惊厥药在边缘型人格障碍和快速循环双相情感障碍中可能具有相似的稳定作用。
相同的机制可能驱动某些形式双相情感障碍中的快速情绪转换以及边缘型人格障碍的情感不稳定,甚至可能源于相同的遗传病因。虽然需要继续对边缘型人格障碍中使用抗惊厥药进行临床研究,但抗惊厥药结合适当的心理治疗可能对治疗这种疾病有用。