Romero M M, Esteve M, Alemany M
Departament de Nutrició i Bromatologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Jul;30(7):1149-56. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803224. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
The combined effects of limited food intake and OE treatment have been analysed in order to determine whether hypocaloric diets enhance the slimming effects of OE on mature overweight male rats. Two levels of dietary limitation at 50 and 25% of a standard intake were established, roughly corresponding to the human LCDs and VLCDs.
Wistar male rats (6 weeks old) were made overweight by a cafeteria diet. After transition to standard diet, they were subjected to food restriction: down to 50 or 25% with respect to the transition period. Half the animals were given daily oral gavages of 10 nmol/g oleoyl-estrone (OE), and the rest received only the vehicle during 10 days.
Changes in weight and body composition: water, lipid, protein or gross energy were determined by comparing the final pool size with that of day 0, calculated from the initial body weight and the composition of untreated rats. Energy and nitrogen balances were estimated. Plasma levels of metabolites and hormones were also measured.
OE induced changes in body composition similar to those elicited by a 50% reduction in food, with massive loss of lipid and energy. OE-treated rats ate less than the controls, but additional effects on body composition on reduced diet were minimal. OE improved metabolic homoeostasis: better maintained glycaemia, lower cholesterol and shallower hormonal changes, but at the expense of slightly increased protein mobilisation.
The data presented suggest that no advantages are accomplished by combining OE treatment and hypocaloric diets compared with OE alone, at least under the experimental conditions tested, since the effects were not additive. Despite OE affecting food intake, mechanisms other than that are deemed responsible for the mobilisation of body fat, since intake alone cannot explain the effects on body weight, nor the metabolic and hormonal changes in OE-treated rats. It is concluded that the combination of food restriction and OE may result in unwanted increased protein mobilisation with no synergy between both slimming treatments.
分析有限食物摄入与油酰雌酮(OE)治疗的联合效果,以确定低热量饮食是否能增强OE对成熟超重雄性大鼠的减肥效果。设定了两种饮食限制水平,分别为标准摄入量的50%和25%,大致相当于人类的低热量饮食(LCDs)和极低热量饮食(VLCDs)。
用自助餐式饮食使6周龄的Wistar雄性大鼠超重。过渡到标准饮食后,对它们进行食物限制:相对于过渡期减少至50%或25%。一半的动物每天经口灌胃10 nmol/g油酰雌酮(OE),其余动物在10天内仅接受赋形剂。
通过将最终总量与第0天的总量进行比较来确定体重和身体成分的变化,第0天的总量根据初始体重和未处理大鼠的成分计算得出。估算能量和氮平衡。还测量了血浆代谢物和激素水平。
OE引起的身体成分变化与食物减少50%引起的变化相似,伴有大量脂质和能量损失。接受OE治疗的大鼠比对照组吃得少,但低热量饮食对身体成分的额外影响很小。OE改善了代谢稳态:血糖维持得更好,胆固醇降低,激素变化较小,但代价是蛋白质动员略有增加。
所呈现的数据表明,至少在所测试的实验条件下,与单独使用OE相比,联合使用OE治疗和低热量饮食没有优势,因为效果并非相加。尽管OE会影响食物摄入,但除了这一点之外的其他机制被认为是身体脂肪动员的原因,因为仅食物摄入量无法解释对体重的影响,也无法解释接受OE治疗的大鼠的代谢和激素变化。得出的结论是,食物限制和OE的联合可能导致不必要的蛋白质动员增加,且两种减肥治疗之间没有协同作用。