Zaslow Martha J, Weinfield Nancy S, Gallagher Megan, Hair Elizabeth C, Ogawa John R, Egeland Byron, Tabors Patton O, De Temple Jeanne M
Child Trends, Washington, DC 20008, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):27-37. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.27.
This study examined predictions from preschool parenting measures to middle childhood cognitive and socioemotional child outcomes to explore whether parenting assessment methodologies that require more time, training, and expense yield better predictions of child outcomes than less intensive methodologies. Mother-child dyads (N = 278) in low-income African American families were assessed when the child was in preschool, using maternal report, the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment-Short Form (P. Baker & F. Mott, 1989; R. Bradley & B. Caldwell, 1984), and structured observational measures of parenting. Child outcomes reported by children, mothers, teachers, and direct assessment were collected 4 years later. All parenting methodologies showed some predictive value; however, observational parenting measures showed the strongest and most consistent predictions of child outcomes.
本研究检验了从学前育儿措施到童年中期儿童认知和社会情感发展结果的预测,以探讨与强度较低的方法相比,那些需要更多时间、培训和费用的育儿评估方法是否能对儿童发展结果做出更好的预测。当孩子处于学前阶段时,对低收入非裔美国家庭中的母婴二元组(N = 278)进行了评估,采用了母亲报告、《环境测量家庭观察简表》(P. 贝克和F. 莫特,1989年;R. 布拉德利和B. 考德威尔,1984年)以及育儿的结构化观察措施。4年后收集了儿童、母亲、教师报告的儿童发展结果以及直接评估结果。所有育儿方法都显示出一定的预测价值;然而,观察性育儿措施对儿童发展结果的预测最强且最一致。