Suppr超能文献

生存方法,包括那些使用竞争风险分析的方法,不适用于重症监护病房结局研究。

Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies.

作者信息

Schoenfeld David

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2006 Feb;10(1):103. doi: 10.1186/cc3949.

Abstract

The preferred analysis for studies of mortality among patients treated in an intensive care unit should compare the proportions of patients who died during hospitalization. Studies that look for prognostic covariates should use logistic regression. Survival methods, such as the proportional hazards model, or methods based on competing risk analysis are not appropriate because prolonged survival among patients that die during their hospitalization does not benefit the patient and, therefore, should not be measured in the statistical analysis.

摘要

对重症监护病房接受治疗的患者进行死亡率研究时,首选的分析方法应是比较住院期间死亡患者的比例。寻找预后协变量的研究应使用逻辑回归。生存方法,如比例风险模型或基于竞争风险分析的方法并不适用,因为在住院期间死亡的患者延长生存时间对患者并无益处,因此在统计分析中不应进行衡量。

相似文献

6
Outcome in patients with long-term treatment in a surgical intensive care unit.长期在外科重症监护病房治疗的患者的结局。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Aug;397(6):995-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0966-0. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
9
Clinician predictions of intensive care unit mortality.临床医生对重症监护病房死亡率的预测。
Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1149-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000126402.51524.52.

引用本文的文献

2
Socially integrated female chimpanzees have lower offspring mortality.社会融合度高的雌性黑猩猩后代死亡率较低。
iScience. 2025 Jun 9;28(7):112863. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112863. eCollection 2025 Jul 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验