Int J Toxicol. 2005;24 Suppl 3:1-56. doi: 10.1080/10915810500257097.
Although Urea is officially described as a buffering agent, humectant, and skin-conditioning agent-humectant for use in cosmetic products, there is a report stating that Urea also is used in cosmetics for its desquamating and antimicrobial action. In 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that Urea was used in 239 formulations. Concentrations of use for Urea ranged from 0.01% to 10%. Urea is generally recognized as safe by FDA for the following uses: side-seam cements for food contact; an inhibitor or stabilizer in pesticide formulations and formulations applied to animals; internal sizing for paper and paperboard and surface sizing and coating of paper and paper board that contact water-in-oil dairy emulsions, low-moisture fats and oils, moist bakery products, dry solids with surface containing no free fats or oil, and dry solids with the surface of fat or oil; and to facilitate fermentation of wine. Urea is the end product of mammalian protein metabolism and the chief nitrogenous compound of urine. Urea concentrations in muscle, liver, and fetuses of rats increased after a subcutaneous injection of Urea. Urea diffused readily through the placenta and into other maternal and fetal organs. The half-life of Urea injected into rabbits was on the order of several hours, and the reutilization rate was 32.2% to 88.8%. Urea given to rats by a bolus injection or continuous infusion resulted in distribution to the following brain regions: frontal lobe, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, thalamus plus hypothalamus, pons and white matter (corpus callosum). The permeability constant after treatment with Urea of whole skin and the dermis of rabbits was 2.37 +/- 0.13 (x 10(6)) and 1.20 +/- 0.09 (x10(3)) cm/min, respectively. The absorption of Urea across normal and abraded human skin was 9.5% +/- 2.3% and 67.9% +/- 5.6%, respectively. Urea increased the skin penetration of other compounds, including hydrocortisone. No toxicity was observed for Urea at levels as high as 2000 mg/kg in acute oral studies using female rats or mice. No signs of toxicity were observed in male piglets dosed orally with up to 4 g/kg Urea for 5 days. Dogs dosed orally with 5 to 30 g/L Urea for 4 to 10 days had signs of toxicity, including weakness, anorexia, vomiting and retching, diarrhea and a decreased body temperature, which led to a deep torpor or coma. No significant microscopic changes were observed in the skin of male nude mice dermally exposed to 100% Urea for 24 h. No observable effect on fetal development was seen in rats and mice dosed orally with an aqueous solution of Urea (2000 mg/kg) on days 10 and 12 of gestation. The mean number of implants, live fetuses, percent fetal resorptions, mean fetal weight, and percent fetuses malformed were comparable to control group. A detergent containing 15% Urea was injected into pregnant ICR-JCl mice and dams and fetuses had no significant differences when compared to control animals. Urea given orally did not enhance the developmental toxicity of N-nitrosomethylurea. Female Sprague-Dawley rats injected in the uterine horn with 0.05 ml Urea on day 3 (preimplantation) or on day 7 (post implantation) exhibited no maternal mortality or morbidity; a dose-dependent reduction in embryo survival was seen with preimplantation treatment. Urea injected intra-amniotically induces mid-trimester abortions in humans. Urea was not genotoxic in several bacterial and mammalian assays; although in assays where Urea was used at a high concentration, genotoxicity was found, many in in vitro assays. Urea is commonly used in studies of DNA because it causes uncoiling of DNA molecules. Urea was not carcinogenic in Fisher 344 rats or C57B1/6 mice fed diets containing up to 4.5% Urea. Exposure of normal human skin to 60% Urea produced no significant irritation in one study, but 5% Urea was slightly irritating and 20% Urea was irritating in other reports. Burning sensations are the most frequently reported effect of Urea used alone or with other agents in treatment of diseased skin. Overall, there are few reports of sensitization among the many clinical studies that report use of Urea in treatment of diseased skin. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel determined the data provided in this report to be sufficient to assess the safety of Urea. The Panel did note that Urea can cause uncoiling of DNA, a property used in many DNA studies, but concluded that this in vitro activity is not linked to any in vivo genotoxic activity. Although noting that formulators should be aware that Urea can increase the percutaneous absorption of other chemicals, the CIR Expert Panel concluded that Urea is safe as used in cosmetic products.
尽管尿素在化妆品中被官方描述为缓冲剂、保湿剂和皮肤调理剂——保湿剂,但有报告称,尿素在化妆品中还因其脱皮和抗菌作用而被使用。2001年,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)报告称,尿素被用于239种配方产品中。尿素的使用浓度范围为0.01%至10%。FDA普遍认为尿素在以下用途中是安全的:用于食品接触的侧缝粘合剂;农药配方和应用于动物的配方中的抑制剂或稳定剂;纸张和纸板的内部施胶以及与油包水乳剂、低水分油脂、潮湿烘焙产品、表面不含游离脂肪或油的干固体以及表面有脂肪或油的干固体接触的纸张和纸板的表面施胶和涂层;以及促进葡萄酒发酵。尿素是哺乳动物蛋白质代谢的终产物,也是尿液中的主要含氮化合物。皮下注射尿素后,大鼠肌肉、肝脏和胎儿中的尿素浓度会升高。尿素很容易通过胎盘扩散到其他母体和胎儿器官中。注入兔子体内的尿素半衰期约为几个小时,再利用率为32.2%至88.8%。给大鼠静脉推注或持续输注尿素后,其分布到以下脑区:额叶、尾状核、海马体、丘脑加下丘脑、脑桥和白质(胼胝体)。用尿素处理后,兔子全皮和真皮的渗透常数分别为2.37±0.13(×10⁶)和1.20±0.09(×10³)cm/min。尿素通过正常和磨损的人体皮肤的吸收率分别为9.5%±2.3%和67.9%±5.6%。尿素增加了包括氢化可的松在内的其他化合物的皮肤渗透率。在使用雌性大鼠或小鼠进行的急性口服研究中,高达2000 mg/kg的尿素剂量未观察到毒性。给雄性仔猪口服高达4 g/kg的尿素,持续5天,未观察到毒性迹象。给狗口服5至30 g/L的尿素,持续4至10天,出现了毒性迹象,包括虚弱、厌食、呕吐和干呕、腹泻以及体温下降,导致深度昏睡或昏迷。将100%尿素经皮暴露于雄性裸鼠皮肤24小时后,未观察到明显的微观变化。在妊娠第10天和第12天给大鼠和小鼠口服尿素水溶液(2000 mg/kg),未观察到对胎儿发育的明显影响。植入物的平均数量、活胎数量、胎儿吸收百分比、平均胎儿体重和畸形胎儿百分比与对照组相当。将含15%尿素的洗涤剂注入怀孕的ICR-JCl小鼠体内,与对照动物相比,母鼠和胎儿没有显著差异。口服尿素不会增强N-亚硝基甲基脲的发育毒性。在第3天(植入前)或第7天(植入后)向雌性斯普拉格-道利大鼠子宫角注射0.05 ml尿素,未观察到母体死亡或发病情况;植入前处理导致胚胎存活率呈剂量依赖性降低。羊膜腔内注射尿素可导致人类中期妊娠流产。在多项细菌和哺乳动物试验中,尿素没有遗传毒性;尽管在一些使用高浓度尿素的试验中发现了遗传毒性,但许多是在体外试验中。尿素常用于DNA研究,因为它会导致DNA分子解旋。在给费希尔344大鼠或C57B1/6小鼠喂食含高达4.5%尿素的饲料时,尿素没有致癌性。在一项研究中,将正常人体皮肤暴露于60%的尿素中未产生明显刺激,但在其他报告中,5%的尿素有轻微刺激性,20%的尿素有刺激性。单独使用或与其他药物联合使用尿素治疗患病皮肤时,最常报告的作用是烧灼感。总体而言,在许多报告使用尿素治疗患病皮肤的临床研究中,关于致敏的报告很少。化妆品成分审查(CIR)专家小组认为本报告提供的数据足以评估尿素的安全性。该小组确实指出,尿素可导致DNA解旋,这一特性在许多DNA研究中被使用,但得出结论认为这种体外活性与任何体内遗传毒性活性无关。尽管指出配方师应意识到尿素可增加其他化学物质的经皮吸收,但CIR专家小组得出结论认为,尿素在化妆品中的使用是安全的。