Jarrar Mohammad, Gaynon Paul S, Periclou Antonia P, Fu Cecilia, Harris Richard E, Stram Daniel, Altman Arnold, Bostrom Bruce, Breneman John, Steele David, Trigg Michael, Zipf Theodore, Avramis Vassilios I
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, USC Keck School of Medicine, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Aug;47(2):141-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20713.
Re-induction outcomes vary for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and marrow relapse. We explored possible relationships among asparaginase (ASNase) activity levels, asparagine (ASN) depletion, anti-ASNase antibody titers, and response to re-induction therapy in children and adolescents with ALL and an 'early' first marrow relapse.
After appropriate informed consent, we enrolled children and adolescents 1-21 years old with ALL and first marrow relapse within 12 months of completion of primary therapy. Induction therapy included intramuscular pegylated ASNase on Days 2 and 16. We assessed ASNase activity, anti-ASNase antibody titers against native and pegylated (E. coli) ASNase, and amino acid levels of asparagine (ASN) and glutamine (GLN) on Days 0, 14, and 35 of re-induction.
Ninety-three patients were at least partially assessable. Among 21 patients with M1 marrow status at Day 35, the median Day 14 ASN level was <1 microM. This is significantly lower than the median Day 14 ASN level of 4 microM in the group of patients with M3 marrow at Day 35. Neither Day 0 nor Day 35 antibody titers predicted ASNase enzymatic activity level on Day 14. Surprisingly, Day 14 ASNase activity did not predict serum ASN level on Day 14. However, Day 0 and Day 35 anti-native ASNase antibody titers, and Day 0 anti-PEG ASNase antibody titers correlated positively with Day 14 serum ASN levels as one might expect from neutralizing antibody. Day 35 anti-PEG ASNase antibody titers did not.
Patients with greater ASN depletion were more likely to achieve second remission in the context of six-drug therapy.
急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)合并骨髓复发患儿的再诱导治疗结果各不相同。我们探讨了天冬酰胺酶(ASNase)活性水平、天冬酰胺(ASN)消耗、抗ASNase抗体滴度与ALL且首次骨髓“早期”复发的儿童及青少年再诱导治疗反应之间的可能关系。
在获得适当的知情同意后,我们纳入了年龄在1至21岁、ALL且在初次治疗完成后12个月内出现首次骨髓复发的儿童及青少年。诱导治疗包括在第2天和第16天肌肉注射聚乙二醇化ASNase。我们在再诱导的第0天、第14天和第35天评估ASNase活性、针对天然和聚乙二醇化(大肠杆菌)ASNase的抗ASNase抗体滴度,以及天冬酰胺(ASN)和谷氨酰胺(GLN)的氨基酸水平。
93例患者至少部分可评估。在第35天骨髓状态为M1的21例患者中,第14天ASN水平的中位数<1微摩尔。这显著低于第35天骨髓状态为M3的患者组中第14天ASN水平中位数4微摩尔。第0天和第35天的抗体滴度均不能预测第14天的ASNase酶活性水平。令人惊讶的是,第14天的ASNase活性并不能预测第14天的血清ASN水平。然而,正如中和抗体所预期的那样,第0天和第35天的抗天然ASNase抗体滴度以及第0天的抗聚乙二醇化ASNase抗体滴度与第14天的血清ASN水平呈正相关。第35天的抗聚乙二醇化ASNase抗体滴度则不然。
在六药联合治疗的情况下,ASN消耗更多的患者更有可能实现第二次缓解。