Suppr超能文献

基于门冬酰胺酶的治疗进行普遍预防用药和治疗药物监测可预防输注相关的急性不良事件和药物替换。

Universal premedication and therapeutic drug monitoring for asparaginase-based therapy prevents infusion-associated acute adverse events and drug substitutions.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Aug;66(8):e27797. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27797. Epub 2019 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asparaginase is a critical component of lymphoblastic leukemia therapy, with intravenous pegaspargase (PEG) as the current standard product. Acute adverse events (aAEs) during PEG infusion are difficult to interpret, representing a mix of drug-inactivating hypersensitivity and noninactivating reactions. Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi (ERW) is approved for PEG hypersensitivity, but is less convenient, more expensive, and yields lower serum asparaginase activity (SAA). We began a policy of universal premedication and SAA testing for PEG, hypothesizing this would reduce aAEs and unnecessary drug substitutions.

PROCEDURE

Retrospective chart review of patients receiving asparaginase before and after universal premedication before PEG was conducted, with SAA performed 1 week later. We excluded patients who had nonallergic asparaginase AEs. Primary end point was substitution to ERW. Secondary end points included aAEs, SAA testing, and cost.

RESULTS

We substituted to ERW in 21 of 122 (17.2%) patients pre-policy, and 5 of 68 (7.4%) post-policy (RR, 0.427; 95% CI, 0.27-0.69, P = 0.028). All completed doses of PEG yielded excellent SAA (mean, 0.90 units/mL), compared with ERW (mean, 0.15 units/mL). PEG inactivation post-policy was seen in 2 of 68 (2.9%), one silent and one with breakthrough aAE. The rate of aAEs pre/post-policy was 17.2% versus 5.9% (RR, 0.342; 95% CI, 0.20-0.58, P = 0.017). Grade 4 aAE rate pre/post-policy was 15% versus 0%. Cost analysis predicts $125 779 drug savings alone per substitution prevented ($12 402/premedicated patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Universal premedication reduced substitutions to ERW and aAE rate. SAA testing demonstrated low rates of silent inactivation, and higher SAA for PEG. A substantial savings was achieved. We propose universal premedication for PEG be standard of care.

摘要

背景

天冬酰胺酶是急性淋巴细胞白血病治疗的关键组成部分,静脉注射聚乙二醇天冬酰胺酶(PEG)是目前的标准产品。PEG 输注过程中的急性不良事件(aAE)难以解释,这是药物失活过敏反应和非失活反应的混合。埃希氏大肠杆菌天冬酰胺酶(ERW)已被批准用于 PEG 过敏反应,但使用不太方便,成本更高,且血清天冬酰胺酶活性(SAA)较低。我们开始对 PEG 进行普遍的预处理和 SAA 检测,假设这将减少 aAE 和不必要的药物替代。

方法

对接受 PEG 治疗前和接受 PEG 治疗前进行普遍预处理的患者进行回顾性图表审查,在 1 周后进行 SAA 检测。我们排除了有非过敏天冬酰胺酶不良反应的患者。主要终点是替代 ERW。次要终点包括 aAE、SAA 检测和成本。

结果

在该政策实施前,我们在 122 名患者中有 21 名(17.2%)替代 ERW,在该政策实施后,有 6 名(7.4%)替代 ERW(RR,0.427;95%CI,0.27-0.69,P=0.028)。所有完成的 PEG 剂量均产生了极好的 SAA(平均 0.90 单位/mL),而 ERW 的 SAA 平均为 0.15 单位/mL。在 68 名患者中,有 2 名(2.9%)发生了 PEG 失活,其中 1 例为沉默性失活,1 例为突破性 aAE。该政策实施前后 aAE 的发生率分别为 17.2%和 5.9%(RR,0.342;95%CI,0.20-0.58,P=0.017)。该政策实施前后,4 级 aAE 的发生率分别为 15%和 0%。成本分析预测,每预防一次替代 ERW,就可节省 125779 美元的药物费用(每例预处理患者节省 12402 美元)。

结论

普遍的预处理减少了 ERW 的替代和 aAE 的发生率。SAA 检测显示,沉默性失活的发生率较低,PEG 的 SAA 较高。实现了大量的节省。我们建议将 PEG 的普遍预处理作为护理标准。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Pegaspargase in Practice: Minimizing Toxicity, Maximizing Benefit.培门冬酶的临床应用:降低毒性,提高获益。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021 Jun;16(3):314-324. doi: 10.1007/s11899-021-00638-0. Epub 2021 May 12.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验