Hunkeler Enid M, Katon Wayne, Tang Lingqi, Williams John W, Kroenke Kurt, Lin Elizabeth H B, Harpole Linda H, Arean Patricia, Levine Stuart, Grypma Lydia M, Hargreaves William A, Unützer Jürgen
Kaiser Permanente, Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
BMJ. 2006 Feb 4;332(7536):259-63. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38683.710255.BE. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
To determine the long term effectiveness of collaborative care management for depression in late life.
Two arm, randomised, clinical trial; intervention one year and follow-up two years.
18 primary care clinics in eight US healthcare organisations. Patients 1801 primary care patients aged 60 and older with major depression, dysthymia, or both.
Patients were randomly assigned to a 12 month collaborative care intervention (IMPACT) or usual care for depression. Teams including a depression care manager, primary care doctor, and psychiatrist offered education, behavioural activation, antidepressants, a brief, behaviour based psychotherapy (problem solving treatment), and relapse prevention geared to each patient's needs and preferences.
Interviewers, blinded to treatment assignment, conducted interviews in person at baseline and by telephone at each subsequent follow up. They measured depression (SCL-20), overall functional impairment and quality of life (SF-12), physical functioning (PCS-12), depression treatment, and satisfaction with care.
IMPACT patients fared significantly (P < 0.05) better than controls regarding continuation of antidepressant treatment, depressive symptoms, remission of depression, physical functioning, quality of life, self efficacy, and satisfaction with care at 18 and 24 months. One year after IMPACT resources were withdrawn, a significant difference in SCL-20 scores (0.23, P < 0.0001) favouring IMPACT patients remained.
Tailored collaborative care actively engages older adults in treatment for depression and delivers substantial and persistent long term benefits. Benefits include less depression, better physical functioning, and an enhanced quality of life. The IMPACT model may show the way to less depression and healthier lives for older adults.
确定协作式护理管理对老年抑郁症的长期疗效。
双臂随机临床试验;干预一年,随访两年。
美国八个医疗保健机构的18家初级保健诊所。患者:1801名60岁及以上患有重度抑郁症、心境恶劣障碍或两者皆有的初级保健患者。
患者被随机分配接受为期12个月的协作式护理干预(IMPACT)或抑郁症常规护理。团队包括一名抑郁症护理经理、初级保健医生和精神科医生,根据每位患者的需求和偏好提供教育、行为激活、抗抑郁药、简短的基于行为的心理治疗(解决问题疗法)以及预防复发措施。
对治疗分配不知情的访谈者在基线时进行面对面访谈,并在随后的每次随访时通过电话进行访谈。他们测量了抑郁程度(SCL - 20)、总体功能损害和生活质量(SF - 12)、身体功能(PCS - 12)、抑郁症治疗情况以及对护理的满意度。
在18个月和24个月时,IMPACT组患者在抗抑郁药治疗的持续性、抑郁症状、抑郁症缓解、身体功能、生活质量、自我效能感以及对护理的满意度方面显著(P < 0.05)优于对照组。IMPACT资源撤出一年后,有利于IMPACT组患者的SCL - 20评分仍存在显著差异(0.23,P < 0.0001)。
量身定制的协作式护理能让老年人积极参与抑郁症治疗,并带来显著且持久的长期益处。益处包括抑郁减轻、身体功能改善以及生活质量提高。IMPACT模式可能为老年人减少抑郁、过上更健康生活指明方向。