Goldmann Kai, Roettger Christine, Wulf Hinnerk
Attending Anesthesiologist, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Therapy, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):405-10. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000194300.56739.1a.
Many problems with the Classic laryngeal mask airway (CLMA) in infants are believed to be related to its inadequate cuff design. One of the main limitations of the CLMA is that the resulting low-pressure seal can be inadequate for positive pressure ventilation (PPV). The ProSeal LMA (PLMA), a new laryngeal mask airway with a modified cuff, has been shown to form a more effective seal than the CLMA in children. The first infant size PLMA, size 1(1/2), became available recently. We studied 30 anesthetized, nonparalyzed infants aged 15 mo (2-30 mo) and weighing 9 kg (5-12 kg). The CLMA and PLMA were inserted in random order into each patient. Airway leak pressure and maximum tidal volume were measured. Ease of insertion, quality of initial airway, and fiberoptic position were also determined. Gastric tube placement was assessed for the PLMA. The mean airway leak pressure in neutral head position (26.7 versus 18.9 cm H2O), maximum flexion (35.6 versus 28.2 cm H2O), and the mean maximum tidal volume (312 versus 260 mL) were significantly higher for the PLMA (P < 0.01). Air entered the stomach in eight patients with the CLMA but did not with the PLMA. Gastric tube placement was possible in all but one patient. In three patients, the use of the PLMA led to some degree of clinically relevant compression of the larynx. The size 1(1/2) PLMA seems to be a more suitable device for airway maintenance in infants than the same size CLMA. The ability to insert a gastric tube at the same time, and a significantly higher airway leak pressure than with the CLMA, may have important implications for its use for PPV in infants.
人们认为,经典喉罩气道(CLMA)在婴儿中存在的许多问题与其袖带设计不完善有关。CLMA的主要局限性之一在于,由此产生的低压密封可能不足以进行正压通气(PPV)。ProSeal喉罩气道(PLMA)是一种新型喉罩气道,其袖带经过改良,已证明在儿童中能形成比CLMA更有效的密封。首款婴儿尺寸的PLMA,即1(1/2)号,最近已上市。我们研究了30名年龄为15个月(2至30个月)、体重9千克(5至12千克)的麻醉状态下未瘫痪的婴儿。CLMA和PLMA以随机顺序插入每位患者体内。测量气道泄漏压力和最大潮气量。还确定了插入的难易程度、初始气道质量和纤维喉镜位置。评估了PLMA的胃管置入情况。PLMA在中立头位时的平均气道泄漏压力(26.7对18.9厘米水柱)、最大屈曲位时(35.6对28.2厘米水柱)以及平均最大潮气量(312对260毫升)均显著更高(P<0.01)。使用CLMA时有八名患者胃内进气,但使用PLMA时未出现这种情况。除一名患者外,其他患者均可置入胃管。在三名患者中,使用PLMA导致了一定程度的临床上相关的喉部压迫。1(1/2)号PLMA似乎比相同尺寸的CLMA更适合用于婴儿气道维持。能够同时插入胃管以及比CLMA显著更高的气道泄漏压力,可能对其在婴儿PPV中的应用具有重要意义。