Suppr超能文献

在控制通气下小儿患者中使用i-gel喉上气道与LMA-ProSeal™的比较。

Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.

作者信息

Saran Sai, Mishra Sandeep Kumar, Badhe Ashok Shankar, Vasudevan Arumugam, Elakkumanan Lenin Babu, Mishra Gayatri

机构信息

Departments of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, Gorimedu, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):195-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.130013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

i-gel™ and the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) are two supraglottic airway devices with gastric channel used for airway maintenance in anesthesia. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of i-gel compared with PLMA for airway maintenance in pediatric patients under general anesthesia with controlled ventilation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 patients were included in the study and randomized to either i-gel or PLMA group. After induction of anesthesia using a standardized protocol for all the patients, one of supraglottic airway devices was inserted. Insertion parameters, ease of gastric tube insertion and fiber-optic scoring of the glottis were noted. Airway parameters such as end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), peak airway pressures and leak airway pressures were noted. Patients were observed for any complications in the first 12 h of the post-operative period.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in terms of ease of insertion, number of attempts and other insertion parameters. Ease of gastric tube insertion, EtCO2, airway pressures (peak and leak airway pressure) and fiber-optic view of the glottis were comparable in both groups. There were no clinically significant complications in the first 12 h of the post-operative period.

CONCLUSION

i-gel is as effective as PLMA in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.

摘要

背景

i-gel™喉罩和ProSeal™喉罩气道(PLMA)是两种带有胃管通道的声门上气道装置,用于麻醉期间的气道维持。本研究旨在评估在控制通气的全身麻醉下,i-gel与PLMA用于小儿患者气道维持的有效性。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入60例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况1级和2级的患者,并随机分为i-gel组或PLMA组。所有患者采用标准化方案诱导麻醉后,插入其中一种声门上气道装置。记录插入参数、胃管插入的难易程度以及声门的纤维光学评分。记录气道参数,如呼气末二氧化碳(EtCO2)、气道峰压和气道漏气压力。观察患者术后12小时内的任何并发症。

结果

两组在插入难易程度、尝试次数和其他插入参数方面具有可比性。两组在胃管插入的难易程度、EtCO2、气道压力(峰压和气道漏气压力)和声门的纤维光学视野方面相当。术后12小时内无临床显著并发症。

结论

在控制通气的小儿患者中,i-gel与PLMA效果相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):195-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.130013.
5
The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):365-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03801.x. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
7
Contrast of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of I-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in patients: A meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0278871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278871. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal from the front and head-end of the patient: A randomized pilot study.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jan-Mar;40(1):95-100. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_240_22. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Supraglottic airway devices: a powerful strategy in airway management.
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 15;14(1):16-32. doi: 10.62347/KJRU4855. eCollection 2024.
4
Contrast of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of I-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in patients: A meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0278871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278871. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparison of Proseal LMA with i-Gel in children under controlled ventilation: a prospective randomised clinical study.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar-Apr;72(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.042. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
6
A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel and ProSeal LMA in children.
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;64(2):125-130. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_635_19. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
7
Comparision of Ambu AuraGain™ and LMA ProSeal in children under controlled ventilation.
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;62(6):455-460. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_86_18.
9
Performance and skill retention of five supraglottic airway devices for the pediatric difficult airway in a manikin.
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jun;177(6):871-878. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3134-x. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
LMA ProSeal(TM) vs. i-Gel(TM) in ventilated children: a randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Nov;56(10):1321-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02765.x. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
2
A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children.
Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):632-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07088.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
3
A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children.
Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):606-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07072.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
7
A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients.
Anaesthesia. 2009 Oct;64(10):1118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06017.x.
8
A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway.
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jun;64(6):674-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05898.x.
10
A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel.
Anesth Analg. 2008 Apr;106(4):1137-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318164f062.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验