• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据实际风险和感知风险来确定艾滋病信息的受众群体。

Targeting the audience for AIDS messages by actual and perceived risk.

作者信息

Snyder L B, Rouse R A

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-1085.

出版信息

AIDS Educ Prev. 1992 Summer;4(2):143-59.

PMID:1642959
Abstract

Since there are many ways to segment an audience into target groups, we suggest that a productive strategy for AIDS education is to divide the audience by their actual and perceived risk. We provide an example in which we segmented an urban U.S. sample and make suggestions as to how messages appropriate for each group can be constructed. In our sample, the "unthreatened" accurately assessed their low risk of AIDS, and showed high knowledge and tolerance rates. The "panicked," who included more women and Hispanics, inaccurately thought themselves at high risk because of misunderstandings about the causes of AIDS, and showed more intolerance of people with AIDS. "Deniers" continued to have multiple sexual partners and take precautions irregularly, despite seeing AIDS as a social problem and having more education and AIDS knowledge. In contrast, "gamblers" recognized their higher risk of AIDS and were most likely to have taken some action, although not enough to prevent sexual transmission of the HIV virus.

摘要

由于将受众细分为目标群体有多种方式,我们建议艾滋病教育的一个有效策略是根据受众实际和感知到的风险进行划分。我们提供了一个对美国城市样本进行细分的例子,并就如何构建适合每个群体的信息提出建议。在我们的样本中,“无威胁者”准确评估了他们感染艾滋病的低风险,并表现出较高的知识水平和宽容率。“恐慌者”包括更多女性和西班牙裔,由于对艾滋病病因的误解,错误地认为自己处于高风险中,并且对艾滋病患者表现出更多的不宽容。“否认者”尽管将艾滋病视为一个社会问题,且接受了更多教育并具备更多艾滋病知识,但仍继续有多个性伴侣且不定期采取预防措施。相比之下,“冒险者”认识到自己感染艾滋病的风险较高,并且最有可能已经采取了一些行动,尽管这些行动不足以预防艾滋病毒的性传播。

相似文献

1
Targeting the audience for AIDS messages by actual and perceived risk.根据实际风险和感知风险来确定艾滋病信息的受众群体。
AIDS Educ Prev. 1992 Summer;4(2):143-59.
2
Linkages between sexual risk taking, substance use, and AIDS knowledge among pregnant adolescents and young mothers.怀孕青少年和年轻母亲的性冒险行为、药物使用与艾滋病知识之间的联系。
Nurs Res. 1995 Nov-Dec;44(6):340-6.
3
Psychosocial predictors of reported HIV-preventive behaviour change among adults in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.津巴布韦布拉瓦约成年人报告的艾滋病毒预防行为改变的社会心理预测因素。
Cent Afr J Med. 1991 Jul;37(7):196-202.
4
AIDS knowledge and risk behaviors among culturally diverse women.不同文化背景女性的艾滋病知识与风险行为
AIDS Educ Prev. 1991 Summer;3(2):79-89.
5
AIDS knowledge and attitudes among injection drug users: the issue of reliability.注射吸毒者对艾滋病的认知与态度:可靠性问题
AIDS Educ Prev. 1992 Spring;4(1):29-40.
6
Evaluating the program effects of a radio drama about AIDS in Zambia.评估赞比亚一部关于艾滋病广播剧的节目效果。
Stud Fam Plann. 1996 Jul-Aug;27(4):188-203.
7
Women's protective sexual behaviors: a test of the health belief model.女性的保护性性行为:健康信念模型的一项检验
AIDS Educ Prev. 1994 Feb;6(1):1-11.
8
Risk assessment for human immunodeficiency virus among pregnant Hispanic adolescents.西班牙裔怀孕青少年人群中人类免疫缺陷病毒的风险评估
Adolescence. 1993 Fall;28(111):597-607.
9
AIDS and condoms in Brasilia: a telephone survey.巴西利亚的艾滋病与避孕套:一项电话调查。
AIDS Educ Prev. 1997 Oct;9(5):472-84.
10
Evolution of college students' AIDS-related behavioral responses, attitudes, knowledge, and fear.大学生与艾滋病相关的行为反应、态度、知识和恐惧的演变。
AIDS Educ Prev. 1990 Winter;2(4):322-37.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent class analysis of sexual risk patterns among esquineros (street corner men) a group of heterosexually identified, socially marginalized men in urban coastal Peru.潜伏类别分析在 esquinaeros(街角男人)中的性行为风险模式,esquinaeros 是秘鲁城市沿海地区一群认同异性恋、社会边缘化的男性。
AIDS Behav. 2011 May;15(4):862-8. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9772-2.
2
Sources of AIDS information among low-risk and at-risk populations in five U.S. cities. AIDS Community Demonstration Projects.美国五个城市低风险和高风险人群中的艾滋病信息来源。艾滋病社区示范项目。
J Community Health. 1996 Aug;21(4):293-310. doi: 10.1007/BF01794879.