Suppr超能文献

脑状态监测仪,一种用于确定麻醉深度的新型小型手持式脑电图监测仪:日间手术中与脑电双频指数的临床比较。

Cerebral state monitor, a new small handheld EEG monitor for determining depth of anaesthesia: a clinical comparison with the bispectral index during day-surgery.

作者信息

Anderson R E, Jakobsson J G

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Mar;23(3):208-12. doi: 10.1017/S0265021505002206.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The cerebral state index (CSI) derived from a new small handheld electroencephalogram monitor was studied during routine day surgical anaesthesia titrated according to the bispectral index (BIS). The objective was to determine the degree of agreement between the two monitors.

METHODS

Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl (0.1 mg) in 38 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for routine day-surgery. Maintenance anaesthesia (sevoflurane (20/38), desflurane (10/38) or propofol (8/38)) titrated by BIS XP (Aspect Medical, Natwick, MA, USA) and BIS and CSI (cerebral State Monitor, Danmeter; Odense, Denmark) index values were recorded every minute. No patient received muscle relaxation. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation rating scale was used to assess level of sedation.

RESULTS

Pair-wise recordings (914) of CSI and BIS were collected. The indices showed similar pattern and decreased with increasing level of sedation, however with large ranges for each level of sedation. Median indices were similar during surgery (BIS: 50 (14-89); CSI: 51 (7-88)) and both indices increased (P 20% from BIS-index in 24% of readings, and on rare occasions CSI indices deviated >100% from the BIS reading. When BIS < 40, CSI decreased slower than BIS and with wider spreading.

CONCLUSIONS

When used for day-surgery anaesthesia without muscle relaxation, CSI and BIS show similar patterns and numerical values but with the incidence of occasionally large discrepancies between pair-wise readings. Which monitor is the more dependable remains to be established and cannot be implied from this initial explorative study.

摘要

背景与目的

在根据脑电双频指数(BIS)进行滴定的日间手术常规麻醉期间,对一种新型小型手持式脑电图监测仪得出的脑状态指数(CSI)进行了研究。目的是确定这两种监测仪之间的一致程度。

方法

对38例接受日间手术全身麻醉的患者,采用丙泊酚和芬太尼(0.1mg)诱导麻醉。通过BIS XP(美国马萨诸塞州纳蒂克市阿斯佩克医疗公司)滴定维持麻醉(七氟醚(20/38)、地氟醚(10/38)或丙泊酚(8/38)),每分钟记录BIS和CSI(脑状态监测仪,丹麦欧登塞市丹梅特公司)指数值。无患者接受肌肉松弛剂。采用观察者警觉/镇静评分量表评估镇静水平。

结果

收集了CSI和BIS的成对记录(914组)。这些指数显示出相似的模式,且随着镇静水平的增加而降低,然而在每个镇静水平下都有较大的范围。手术期间中位数指数相似(BIS:50(14 - 89);CSI:51(7 - 88)),并且两个指数均升高(P < 0.001)。CSI指数在24%的读数中与BIS指数相差 > 20%,并且在极少数情况下,CSI指数与BIS读数相差 > 100%。当BIS < 40时,CSI下降比BIS慢且离散度更大。

结论

在用于无肌肉松弛的日间手术麻醉时,CSI和BIS显示出相似的模式和数值,但成对读数之间偶尔会出现较大差异。哪种监测仪更可靠仍有待确定,且不能从这项初步探索性研究中推断出来。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验