Anil Leena, Anil Sukumarannair S, Deen John
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, MN 55108, USA.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2005;8(4):261-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0804_3.
Pain in nonhuman animals is a difficult concept to identify and measure. This article briefly describes the consequences of pain in animals on the farm and explains the reasons for the minimal use of analgesics in farmed animals. Pain can have implications for both animal welfare and economics. The reasons for a low use of analgesics in farmed animals include the lack of recognition of animal pain owing to the apparent lack of anthropomorphically identifiable behavioral changes, concern over human food safety, and lack of research efforts to develop safe analgesics for farm use. Treatment cost relative to the benefits expected is another hindering factor. Interventions to minimize pain must begin with developing objective and practical measures for pain identification and measurement at the farm level. A suggested use of a combination of different behavioral and physiological indicators would help to identify pain in animals. To facilitate continued usage of the methodologies on the farm it also is necessary to evaluate the economic implication of the pain alleviation intervention.
非人类动物的疼痛是一个难以识别和衡量的概念。本文简要描述了农场动物疼痛的后果,并解释了养殖动物中镇痛药使用极少的原因。疼痛对动物福利和经济都有影响。养殖动物中镇痛药使用较少的原因包括,由于明显缺乏拟人化可识别的行为变化而未认识到动物的疼痛、对人类食品安全的担忧,以及缺乏为农场使用开发安全镇痛药的研究努力。相对于预期效益的治疗成本是另一个阻碍因素。将疼痛降至最低的干预措施必须从制定农场层面疼痛识别和测量的客观实用方法开始。建议结合使用不同的行为和生理指标来帮助识别动物的疼痛。为便于在农场持续使用这些方法,还必须评估减轻疼痛干预措施的经济影响。