Suppr超能文献

大环内酯类耐药肺炎支原体的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

作者信息

Suzuki Satowa, Yamazaki Tsutomu, Narita Mitsuo, Okazaki Norio, Suzuki Isao, Andoh Tomoaki, Matsuoka Mayumi, Kenri Tsuyoshi, Arakawa Yoshichika, Sasaki Tsuguo

机构信息

Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Feb;50(2):709-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.709-712.2006.

Abstract

Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MR M. pneumoniae) has been isolated from clinical specimens in Japan since 2000. A comparative study was carried out to determine whether or not macrolides are effective in treating patients infected with MR M. pneumoniae. The clinical courses of 11 patients with MR M. pneumoniae infection (MR patients) treated with macrolides were compared with those of 26 patients with macrolide-susceptible M. pneumoniae infection (MS patients). The total febrile days and the number of febrile days during macrolide administration were longer in the MR patients than in the MS patients (median of 8 days versus median of 5 days [P = 0.019] and 3 days versus 1 day [P = 0.002], respectively). In addition, the MR patients were more likely than the MS patients to have had a change of the initially prescribed macrolide to another antimicrobial agent (63.6% versus 3.8%; odds ratio, 43.8; P < 0.001), which might reflect the pediatrician's judgment that the initially prescribed macrolide was not sufficiently effective in these patients. Despite the fact that the febrile period was prolonged in MR patients given macrolides, the fever resolved even when the initial prescription was not changed. These results show that macrolides are certainly less effective in MR patients.

摘要

自2000年以来,日本已从临床标本中分离出耐大环内酯类肺炎支原体(MR肺炎支原体)。开展了一项比较研究,以确定大环内酯类药物对治疗MR肺炎支原体感染患者是否有效。将11例接受大环内酯类药物治疗的MR肺炎支原体感染患者(MR患者)的临床病程与26例大环内酯类敏感肺炎支原体感染患者(MS患者)的临床病程进行了比较。MR患者的总发热天数和大环内酯类药物给药期间的发热天数均长于MS患者(中位数分别为8天对5天[P = 0.019]和3天对1天[P = 0.002])。此外,MR患者比MS患者更有可能将最初开具的大环内酯类药物更换为另一种抗菌药物(63.6%对3.8%;比值比,43.8;P < 0.001),这可能反映了儿科医生的判断,即最初开具的大环内酯类药物对这些患者的疗效不足。尽管给予大环内酯类药物的MR患者发热期延长,但即使不改变初始处方,发热也会消退。这些结果表明,大环内酯类药物对MR患者的疗效肯定较差。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae.大环内酯类耐药肺炎支原体的临床评估
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Feb;50(2):709-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.709-712.2006.

引用本文的文献

2
Therapeutic efficacy of lascufloxacin in patients with pneumonia.拉斯库氟沙星对肺炎患者的治疗效果。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Aug 5;13(8):e0025525. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00255-25. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
pneumonia in children.儿童肺炎
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Feb 16;13(5):99149. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i5.99149.
6
Challenges in the treatment of pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.儿童肺炎支原体肺炎治疗面临的挑战。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jul;183(7):3001-3011. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05519-1. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

5
Eaton agent pneumonia.伊顿因子肺炎
JAMA. 1961 Apr 15;176:118-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.1961.03040150034009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验