Beer Brigitte E, Doncel Gustavo F, Krebs Fred C, Shattock Robin J, Fletcher Patricia S, Buckheit Robert W, Watson Karen, Dezzutti Charlene S, Cummins James E, Bromley Ena, Richardson-Harman Nicola, Pallansch Luke A, Lackman-Smith Carol, Osterling Clay, Mankowski Marie, Miller Shendra R, Catalone Bradley J, Welsh Patricia A, Howett Mary K, Wigdahl Brian, Turpin Jim A, Reichelderfer Patricia
Southern Research Institute, 431 Aviation Way, Frederick, MD 21701, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Feb;50(2):713-23. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.713-723.2006.
The first product to be clinically evaluated as a microbicide contained the nonionic surfactant nonoxynol-9 (nonylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol; N-9). Many laboratories have used N-9 as a control compound for microbicide assays. However, no published comparisons of the results among laboratories or attempts to establish standardized protocols for preclinical testing of microbicides have been performed. In this study, we compared results from 127 N-9 toxicity and 72 efficacy assays that were generated in five different laboratories over the last six years and were performed with 14 different cell lines or tissues. Intra-assay reproducibility was measured at two-, three-, and fivefold differences using standard deviations. Interassay reproducibility was assessed using general linear models, and interaction between variables was studied using step-wise regression. The intra-assay reproducibility within the same N-9 concentration, cell type, assay duration, and laboratory was consistent at the twofold level of standard deviations. For interassay reproducibility, cell line, duration of assay, and N-9 concentration were all significant sources of variability (P < 0.01). Half-maximal toxicity concentrations for N-9 were similar between laboratories for assays of similar exposure durations, but these similarities decreased with lower test concentrations of N-9. Results for both long (>24 h) and short (<2 h) exposures of cells to N-9 showed variability, while assays with 4 to 8 h of N-9 exposure gave results that were not significantly different. This is the first analysis to compare preclinical N-9 toxicity levels that were obtained by different laboratories using various protocols. This comparative work can be used to develop standardized microbicide testing protocols that will help advance potential microbicides to clinical trials.
首个接受临床评估的杀微生物剂产品含有非离子表面活性剂壬苯醇醚-9(壬基苯氧基聚乙氧基乙醇;N-9)。许多实验室已将N-9用作杀微生物剂检测的对照化合物。然而,尚未有关于各实验室结果的已发表比较,也未尝试建立杀微生物剂临床前检测的标准化方案。在本研究中,我们比较了过去六年在五个不同实验室生成的127项N-9毒性检测和72项效力检测的结果,这些检测使用了14种不同的细胞系或组织。使用标准差在两倍、三倍和五倍差异水平下测量检测内的可重复性。使用一般线性模型评估检测间的可重复性,并使用逐步回归研究变量之间的相互作用。在相同的N-9浓度、细胞类型、检测持续时间和实验室条件下,检测内的可重复性在两倍标准差水平上是一致的。对于检测间的可重复性,细胞系、检测持续时间和N-9浓度都是显著的变异来源(P < 0.01)。在相似暴露持续时间的检测中,不同实验室之间N-9的半数最大毒性浓度相似,但随着N-9检测浓度降低,这些相似性减小。细胞对N-9的长时间(>24小时)和短时间(<2小时)暴露的结果均显示出变异性,而N-9暴露4至8小时的检测结果无显著差异。这是首次比较不同实验室使用各种方案获得的临床前N-9毒性水平的分析。这项比较工作可用于制定标准化的杀微生物剂检测方案,这将有助于推动潜在的杀微生物剂进入临床试验阶段。