Suppr超能文献

痔切除术——激光与非激光:门诊手术经验

Hemorrhoidectomy--laser vs. nonlaser: outpatient surgical experience.

作者信息

Leff E I

机构信息

Division of Colon-Rectal Surgery, Phoenix Baptist Hospital, Arizona.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Aug;35(8):743-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02050322.

Abstract

Two hundred twenty-six patients underwent operative hemorrhoidectomy by a single surgeon in a three-year period. In 170 patients (75.2 percent), the operation was performed utilizing the CO2 laser. Standard closed hemorrhoidectomy was done in the rest. Patients were monitored prospectively for postoperative pain, wound healing, and complications. The feasibility of undergoing operative hemorrhoidectomy as an outpatient was also monitored. No differences were seen between laser and nonlaser hemorrhoidectomy. Outpatient surgery was done in over 72 percent of the patients without any added risk to them.

摘要

在三年时间里,同一位外科医生为226例患者实施了手术切除痔疮治疗。其中170例患者(75.2%)采用二氧化碳激光进行手术,其余患者则实施标准的闭合式痔疮切除术。对患者术后疼痛、伤口愈合及并发症情况进行了前瞻性监测,同时也监测了门诊手术切除痔疮的可行性。激光手术与非激光手术切除痔疮之间未发现差异。超过72%的患者接受了门诊手术,且未给他们带来额外风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验