Morise Anthony P
Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Feb 1;97(3):367-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.054. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
Estrogen status (ES) has previously been shown to be a marker of angiographic outcome in women. In light of this finding, a reevaluation of ES as a marker of prognosis was undertaken. Two thousand one hundred forty-three women who underwent stress testing for symptoms of suspected coronary disease were studied. ES was defined according to menopausal, ovarian, and hormone replacement therapy status. The end points of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis with censoring at revascularization. Compared with 1,362 ES-positive women, the 781 ES-negative women had a higher frequency of unfavorable end points (all-cause death: ES positive 31 [2.3%] vs ES negative 94 [12%], p < 0.0001, cardiac death: ES positive 11 [0.8%] vs ES negative 38 [4.9%], p < 0.0001, and nonfatal myocardial infarction: ES positive 11 [0.8%] vs ES negative 17 [2.2%], p = 0.007). The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis indicated that ES was a marker of cardiac risk (p < 0.0001) in all women, as well as in postmenopausal women. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that ES was an independent marker of risk (p < 0.001) when considered with other standard risk factors. Using logistic regression and area under the curve analyses, ES had incremental value compared with standard risk factors. In conclusion, ES appears to be an easily discernible independent marker of risk that provides incremental prognostic information compared with standard clinical variables in women with symptoms of suspected coronary disease presenting for stress testing.
雌激素状态(ES)此前已被证明是女性血管造影结果的一个标志物。鉴于这一发现,对ES作为预后标志物进行了重新评估。对2143名因疑似冠心病症状接受负荷试验的女性进行了研究。ES根据绝经、卵巢和激素替代治疗状态进行定义。感兴趣的终点是全因死亡率、心源性死亡和非致命性心肌梗死。使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,并使用Cox回归分析进行血管重建时的删失。与1362名ES阳性女性相比,781名ES阴性女性出现不良终点的频率更高(全因死亡:ES阳性31例[2.3%] vs ES阴性94例[12%],p<0.0001;心源性死亡:ES阳性11例[0.8%] vs ES阴性38例[4.9%],p<0.0001;非致命性心肌梗死:ES阳性11例[0.8%] vs ES阴性17例[2.2%],p = 0.007)。Kaplan-Meier曲线分析表明,ES是所有女性以及绝经后女性心脏风险的标志物(p<0.0001)。多变量Cox回归分析显示,与其他标准风险因素一起考虑时,ES是一个独立的风险标志物(p<0.001)。通过逻辑回归和曲线下面积分析,与标准风险因素相比,ES具有增量价值。总之,ES似乎是一个易于识别的独立风险标志物,与因疑似冠心病症状前来进行负荷试验的女性的标准临床变量相比,它能提供增量预后信息。