Jeetley Paramjit, Burden Leah, Greaves Kim, Senior Roxy
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital and Institute for Medical Education and Research, Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;99(10):1369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.062. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
We hypothesized that myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) could be used to stratify risk in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram and negative troponin. Pretest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scores were determined. Exercise electrocardiographic data in those patients undergoing treadmill stress echocardiography as part of risk evaluation were analyzed independently of echocardiographic data. On a separate day, low-power MCE at rest and during vasodilator stress was performed. All patients were followed for cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization). Of 148 patients, 27 demonstrated abnormal myocardial contrast echocardiographic results and had higher cardiac event rates compared with those with normal myocardial contrast echocardiographic findings (59% vs 7%, p <0.0001) at follow-up (8 +/- 5 months). Hard cardiac event rates (death and nonfatal myocardial infarction) were low (3%) in patients with normal myocardial contrast echocardiographic findings. Cardiac events in patients with abnormal myocardial contrast echocardiographic findings (59%) were significantly higher than those predicted by a high-risk TIMI score (33%, p = 0.0023) and compared with those predicted by high-risk exercise electrocardiography (80% vs 57%, p = 0.0003). In conclusion, stress MCE was superior to TIMI risk score and exercise electrocardiography in the assessment of risk in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram, and negative troponin.
我们假设,心肌对比超声心动图(MCE)可用于对疑似急性冠脉综合征但心电图无诊断意义且肌钙蛋白阴性的患者进行风险分层。测定了心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)的预试验评分。对那些作为风险评估一部分接受平板运动超声心动图检查的患者,其运动心电图数据独立于超声心动图数据进行分析。在另一天,进行了静息和血管扩张剂负荷下的低功率MCE检查。所有患者均接受心脏事件(心源性死亡、心肌梗死和血运重建)随访。在148例患者中,27例心肌对比超声心动图结果异常,与心肌对比超声心动图结果正常的患者相比,随访期间(8±5个月)心脏事件发生率更高(59%对7%,p<0.0001)。心肌对比超声心动图结果正常的患者严重心脏事件发生率(死亡和非致命性心肌梗死)较低(3%)。心肌对比超声心动图结果异常的患者心脏事件发生率(59%)显著高于高危TIMI评分预测的发生率(33%,p = 0.0023),与高危运动心电图预测的发生率相比也更高(80%对57%,p = 0.0003)。总之,在评估疑似急性冠脉综合征、心电图无诊断意义且肌钙蛋白阴性的患者风险方面,负荷MCE优于TIMI风险评分和运动心电图。