Detling Nicole, Smith Aynsley, Nishimura Rick, Keller Shelly, Martinez Matthew, Young William, Holmes David
Department of Exercise and Sport Science Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):522-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.044.
This study examined the psychophysiologic responses of invasive cardiologists during cardiac catheterizations. Because occupations are most stressful when one is not in control, the effect of a teaching versus an autonomous role on the psychophysiologic response of invasive cardiologists was investigated.
The subjects were 9 invasive cardiologists. Psychophysiologic variables such as state anxiety and salivary cortisol levels were measured before and after each invasive cardiologist performed 7 cardiac catheterizations. Heart rate was measured before, during, and after procedures. Three procedures were studied while invasive cardiologists were in the primary operator (autonomous) role with full responsibility and control, whereas 4 were studied while the subjects were in the secondary assistant (teaching) role with full responsibility and no control.
There were no significant differences in physiologic arousal (heart rate and salivary cortisol levels) between catheterizations performed in the autonomous role versus those in the teaching role. However, the perceived anxiety scores were higher when in the teaching role versus when in the autonomous role. There were significant differences in psychophysiologic measurements of stress between less experienced cardiologists (out of training < 5 years) and more experienced cardiologists (out of training > 5 years). Less experienced invasive cardiologists had significantly higher trait anxiety (38.4 vs 31.7, P = .001), baseline salivary cortisol levels (0.51 vs 0.33, P = .01), and heart rate change (50.1 vs 27.4 beats/min, P = .001) during procedures compared with more experienced cardiologists.
Although there were no overall differences in the physiologic response to the autonomous and teaching roles, there was a higher perceived state of anxiety when in the teaching role. Less experienced invasive cardiologists had higher psychophysiologic measurements of stress during invasive procedures than did more experienced cardiologists.
本研究考察了介入心脏病专家在心脏导管插入术期间的心理生理反应。由于当一个人无法掌控局面时职业压力最大,因此研究了教学角色与自主角色对介入心脏病专家心理生理反应的影响。
受试者为9名介入心脏病专家。在每位介入心脏病专家进行7次心脏导管插入术之前和之后,测量心理生理变量,如状态焦虑和唾液皮质醇水平。在手术前、手术期间和手术后测量心率。研究了3次手术,期间介入心脏病专家担任主要操作者(自主)角色,承担全部责任并拥有控制权;而研究了4次手术,期间受试者担任次要助手(教学)角色,承担全部责任但没有控制权。
自主角色下进行的导管插入术与教学角色下进行的导管插入术之间,生理唤醒(心率和唾液皮质醇水平)没有显著差异。然而,与自主角色相比,担任教学角色时的感知焦虑得分更高。经验不足的心脏病专家(培训结束<5年)与经验更丰富的心脏病专家(培训结束>5年)在压力的心理生理测量方面存在显著差异。与经验更丰富的心脏病专家相比,经验不足的介入心脏病专家在手术期间的特质焦虑(38.4对31.7,P = 0.001)、基线唾液皮质醇水平(0.51对0.33,P = 0.01)和心率变化(50.1对27.4次/分钟,P = 0.001)显著更高。
尽管对自主角色和教学角色的生理反应总体上没有差异,但担任教学角色时的感知焦虑状态更高。经验不足的介入心脏病专家在介入手术期间的心理生理压力测量值高于经验更丰富的心脏病专家。