• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公平与健康的概念和原则。

The concepts and principles of equity and health.

作者信息

Whitehead M

机构信息

The Old School, Ash Magna, Whitchurch, Shropshire, England.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429-45. doi: 10.2190/986L-LHQ6-2VTE-YRRN.

DOI:10.2190/986L-LHQ6-2VTE-YRRN
PMID:1644507
Abstract

In 1984, the 32 member states of the World Health Organization European Region took a remarkable step forward in agreeing unanimously on 38 targets for a common health policy for the Region. Not only was equity the subject of the first of these targets, but it was also seen as a fundamental theme running right through the policy as a whole. However, equity can mean different things to different people. This article looks at the concepts and principles of equity as understood in the context of the World Health Organization's Health for All policy. After considering the possible causes of the differences in health observed in populations--some of them inevitable and some unnecessary and unfair--the author discusses equity in relation to health care, concentrating on issues of access to care, utilization, and quality. Lastly, seven principles for action are outlined, stemming from these concepts, to be borne in mind when designing or implementing policies, so that greater equity in health and health care can be promoted.

摘要

1984年,世界卫生组织欧洲区域的32个成员国向前迈出了非凡的一步,一致商定了该区域共同卫生政策的38项目标。公平不仅是这些目标中的首要目标,而且被视为贯穿整个政策的一个基本主题。然而,公平对不同的人可能意味着不同的事情。本文探讨了在世界卫生组织“人人享有健康”政策背景下所理解的公平概念和原则。在考虑了人群中观察到的健康差异的可能原因——其中一些是不可避免的,一些是不必要的和不公平的——之后,作者讨论了与医疗保健相关的公平问题,重点关注获得医疗服务、利用医疗服务和医疗质量等问题。最后,概述了从这些概念中衍生出来的七项行动原则,在设计或实施政策时应牢记这些原则,以便促进健康和医疗保健方面更大的公平性。

相似文献

1
The concepts and principles of equity and health.公平与健康的概念和原则。
Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429-45. doi: 10.2190/986L-LHQ6-2VTE-YRRN.
2
Health for All in the Twenty-First Century, World Health Organization renewal, and equity in health: a commentary.《21世纪全民健康、世界卫生组织的复兴与健康公平:一篇评论》
Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(3):647-58. doi: 10.2190/31AY-78AP-JAUL-BD61.
3
Equity and distributive justice in European health care reform.欧洲医疗保健改革中的公平与分配正义
Int J Health Serv. 1997;27(3):443-53. doi: 10.2190/W0LD-0299-P8H8-0GCA.
4
Priorities for research to take forward the health equity policy agenda.推进健康公平政策议程的研究重点。
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Dec;83(12):948-53. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
5
WHO in Europe 1991.1991年欧洲的世界卫生组织。
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 1991;41:1-17.
6
Improving equity in health: a research agenda.改善健康公平性:一项研究议程。
Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(3):545-66. doi: 10.2190/DGJ8-4MQW-UP9J-LQC1.
7
Poverty, equity, human rights and health.贫困、公平、人权与健康。
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(7):539-45. Epub 2003 Sep 3.
8
[The law and equity in health].[健康领域的法律与公平]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2002 May-Jun;11(5-6):444-8. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892002000500022.
9
WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide.世卫组织欧洲健康决定因素和卫生鸿沟审查。
Lancet. 2012 Sep 15;380(9846):1011-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
10
Equity of access to health care: some conceptual and ethical issues.医疗保健的公平可及性:一些概念和伦理问题。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1982 Winter;60(1):51-81.

引用本文的文献

1
[Digital health and its impacts on the access of minority groups to primary care: a systematic reviewLa salud digital y su impacto en el acceso a la atención primaria de salud en grupos minoritarios: revisión sistemática].[数字健康及其对少数群体获得初级医疗保健的影响:系统评价 数字健康及其对少数群体获得初级卫生保健的影响:系统评价]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 Sep 11;49:e96. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.96. eCollection 2025.
2
Reporting of health equity considerations in equity-relevant observational studies: Protocol for a systematic assessment.在与公平性相关的观察性研究中报告健康公平性考量因素:一项系统评估方案
F1000Res. 2022 Jun 6;11:615. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122185.1. eCollection 2022.
3
A discourse analysis of social inequities, gender, and stigma in tuberculosis policies of seven countries from Africa, Asia, Europe and South America.
对非洲、亚洲、欧洲和南美洲七个国家结核病政策中的社会不平等、性别和耻辱感进行的话语分析。
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2547150. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2547150. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
4
Global disparities in gynecologic cancer outcomes: A call for action.妇科癌症治疗结果的全球差异:行动呼吁。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Sep;171 Suppl 1:210-220. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70278.
5
Writing about health inequality: recommendations for accurate and impactful presentation of evidence.撰写关于健康不平等的文章:准确且有影响力地呈现证据的建议。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Sep 2;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02548-6.
6
Generators of Inequality and Inequity Affecting Dental Patient Safety: A Grounded Theory Approach.影响牙科患者安全的不平等和不公平现象的根源:一种扎根理论方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 9;22(8):1248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081248.
7
Precision Medicine for Cancer and Health Equity in Latin America: Generating Understanding for Policy and Health System Shaping.拉丁美洲癌症精准医学与健康公平:增进对政策制定和卫生系统塑造的理解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 5;22(8):1220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081220.
8
Health inequalities and outcomes following acute kidney injury: a systematic review & meta-analyses of observational studies.急性肾损伤后的健康不平等与结局:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Aug 27;26(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04391-x.
9
Creating Digital Health Technology for Gender Equity: a Capabilities Approach.为性别平等创建数字健康技术:一种能力方法。
Public Health Ethics. 2025 Aug 22;18(3):phaf012. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaf012. eCollection 2025 Nov.
10
The socioeconomic and health system determinants of financial protection indicators: a global systematic review (2008-2023).财务保护指标的社会经济和卫生系统决定因素:一项全球系统综述(2008 - 2023年)
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 25;10(8):e017859. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017859.