Suppr超能文献

佩戴眼镜、隐形眼镜或接受屈光手术的人群的生活质量比较。

A quality of life comparison of people wearing spectacles or contact lenses or having undergone refractive surgery.

作者信息

Pesudovs Konrad, Garamendi Estibaliz, Elliott David B

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;22(1):19-27. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-07.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the use of the Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire for comparing the quality of life of pre-presbyopic individuals with refractive correction by spectacles, contact lenses, or refractive surgery.

METHODS

The 20-item QIRC questionnaire was administered to 104 spectacle wearers, 104 contact lens wearers, and 104 individuals who had undergone refractive surgery (N = 312). These groups were similar for gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and refractive error. The main outcome measure was QIRC overall score (scaled from 0 to 100), a measure of refractive correction related quality of life. Groups were compared for overall QIRC score and on each question by analysis of variance, adjusted for age, with post hoc significance testing (Sheffé).

RESULTS

On average, refractive surgery patients scored significantly better (mean QIRC score 50.2 +/- 6.3, F(2,309) = 15.18, P < .001) than contact lens wearers (46.7 +/- 5.5, post hoc P < .001) who were in turn significantly better than spectacle wearers (44.1 +/- 5.9, post hoc P < .01). Convenience questions chiefly drove the differences between groups, although functioning, symptoms, economic concerns, heath concerns, and well being were also important. Spectacle wearers with low strength prescriptions (46.18 +/- 5.05) scored significantly better than those with medium strength prescriptions (42.74 +/- 6.08, F(2,190) = 3.66, P < .05, post hoc P < .05). A small number (n = 7, 6.7%) of refractive surgery patients experienced postoperative complications, which impacted quality of life (37.86 +/- 2.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of life was lowest in spectacle wearers, particularly those with higher corrections. Contact lens wearers had significantly better QIRC score than spectacle wearers. Refractive surgery patients scored significantly better than both. However, this was accompanied by a small risk of poor quality of life due to postoperative complications. The QIRC is an effective outcome measure for quality of life impact of refractive correction.

摘要

目的

证明使用屈光矫正生活质量影响(QIRC)问卷来比较老视前期个体通过眼镜、隐形眼镜或屈光手术进行屈光矫正后的生活质量。

方法

对104名眼镜佩戴者、104名隐形眼镜佩戴者和104名接受屈光手术的个体(N = 312)进行了包含20个条目的QIRC问卷调查。这些组在性别、种族、社会经济地位和屈光不正方面相似。主要结局指标是QIRC总分(范围从0到100),这是一种衡量与屈光矫正相关的生活质量的指标。通过方差分析对各组的QIRC总分及每个问题进行比较,并对年龄进行校正,采用事后显著性检验(谢费检验)。

结果

平均而言,屈光手术患者的得分显著高于隐形眼镜佩戴者(平均QIRC得分为50.2±6.3,F(2,309) = 15.18,P <.001),隐形眼镜佩戴者(46.7±5.5,事后P <.001)又显著高于眼镜佩戴者(44.1±5.9,事后P <.01)。便利性问题是导致各组之间差异的主要原因,尽管功能、症状、经济担忧、健康担忧和幸福感也很重要。低度数眼镜佩戴者(46.18±5.05)的得分显著高于中度度数眼镜佩戴者(42.74±6.08,F(2,190) = 3.66,P <.05,事后P <.05)。少数(n = 7,6.7%)屈光手术患者经历了术后并发症,这影响了生活质量(37.86±2.13)。

结论

眼镜佩戴者的生活质量最低,尤其是那些矫正度数较高的人。隐形眼镜佩戴者的QIRC得分显著高于眼镜佩戴者。屈光手术患者的得分显著高于两者。然而,这伴随着因术后并发症导致生活质量不佳的小风险。QIRC是衡量屈光矫正对生活质量影响的有效结局指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验