Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症患者中针对治疗性β-干扰素的中和抗体分析:在一个大型澳大拉西亚队列中三种方法的比较

Analysis of neutralizing antibodies to therapeutic interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients: a comparison of three methods in a large Australasian cohort.

作者信息

McKay Fiona, Schibeci Stephen, Heard Robert, Stewart Graeme, Booth David

机构信息

Institute for Immunology and Allergy Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Australia.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 2006 Mar 20;310(1-2):20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2005.11.011. Epub 2005 Dec 20.

Abstract

Persistent high-titre neutralizing antibodies (NAB) to therapeutic interferon-beta(IFNbeta)in multiple sclerosis patients reduce therapeutic efficacy. Difficulties in standardization of cell-based bioactivity assays have hindered interlaboratory comparison of NAB titres and the determination of a clinically relevant definition of seropositivity. We determined NAB status in Australasian multiple sclerosis patients receiving IFNbetausing both the antiviral cytopathic effect (CPE) assay (n = 227) and the more specific ELISA for the type I interferon-inducible MxA protein (n = 350). While the log(10) titres determined in the two assays were highly correlated (p < 0.0001; r = 0.967) with similar distributions, the MxA assay was more sensitive, detecting lower concentrations of NAB than the CPE assay. The range of titres determined in the CPE assay was 10 to >7290; and 9 to 53,700 in the MxA assay, with ranked titre distribution highlighting the arbitrary nature of currently accepted definitions of NAB seropositivity. Bioactivity of injected IFNbetawas significantly reduced in NAB-positive patients (p = 0.006; NAB MxA titres = 184 to 5340) compared to NAB-negative patients as assessed ex vivo using real-time RT-PCR analysis of MxA gene induction. The range of MxA mRNA levels in healthy controls was remarkably consistent with previously published results, regardless of the assay standardization method [Gilli, F., Sala, A., Marnetto, F., Lindberg, R.L., Leppert, D. and Bertolotto, A. (2003) Comparison of IFNbeta bioavailability evaluations by MxA mRNA using two independent quantification methods. Abstract, ECTRIMS Meeting, Milan, Italy; Pachner, A., Narayan, K., Price, N., Hurd, M. and Dail, D. (2003a) MxA Gene Expression Analysis as an Interferon-beta Bioactivity Measurement in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and the Identification of Antibody-Mediated Decreased Bioactivity. Mol. Diagn. 7, 17-25]. Assessment of IFNbetaresponse ex vivo accounts for both circulating factors and the cellular response to IFNbeta, and the data support the development of the MxA gene induction assay for the routine screening of patients receiving IFNbeta.

摘要

多发性硬化症患者体内持续存在的针对治疗性干扰素β(IFNβ)的高滴度中和抗体(NAB)会降低治疗效果。基于细胞的生物活性测定标准化方面的困难阻碍了实验室间NAB滴度的比较以及血清阳性临床相关定义的确定。我们使用抗病毒细胞病变效应(CPE)测定法(n = 227)和更特异的针对I型干扰素诱导的Mx A蛋白的ELISA法(n = 350),确定了接受IFNβ治疗的澳大利亚多发性硬化症患者的NAB状态。虽然两种测定法所确定的log(10)滴度高度相关(p < 0.0001;r = 0.967)且分布相似,但Mx A测定法更敏感,能检测到比CPE测定法更低浓度的NAB。CPE测定法确定的滴度范围为10至>7290;Mx A测定法为9至53,700,滴度排名分布突出了当前公认的NAB血清阳性定义的随意性。与NAB阴性患者相比,NAB阳性患者(p = 0.006;NAB Mx A滴度 = 184至5340)注射的IFNβ的生物活性通过对Mx A基因诱导的实时RT-PCR分析进行体外评估时显著降低。无论测定标准化方法如何,健康对照中Mx A mRNA水平的范围与先前发表的结果非常一致[吉利,F.,萨拉,A.,马尔内托,F.,林德伯格,R.L.,莱珀特,D.和贝托洛托,A.(2003年)使用两种独立定量方法通过Mx A mRNA评估IFNβ生物利用度的比较。摘要,ECTRIMS会议,意大利米兰;帕赫纳,A.,纳拉扬,K.,普赖斯,N.,赫德,M.和戴尔,D.(2003a年)Mx A基因表达分析作为多发性硬化症患者中干扰素β生物活性的测量方法以及抗体介导的生物活性降低的鉴定。分子诊断学7,17 - 25]。体外评估IFNβ反应同时考虑了循环因子和细胞对IFNβ的反应,并且这些数据支持开发用于接受IFNβ治疗患者常规筛查的Mx A基因诱导测定法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验