van der Voort L F, Kok A, Visser A, Oudejans C B M, Caldano M, Gilli F, Bertolotto A, Polman C H, Killestein J
Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mult Scler. 2009 Feb;15(2):212-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458508096877. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
Neutralising antibodies (NAb) to interferon beta (IFN beta) are associated with a reduced bioactivity and efficacy of IFN beta in multiple sclerosis (MS). Unclear is how to apply IFN beta bioactivity measurements (quantification of Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) mRNA) in clinical practice.
To evaluate value and feasibility of IFN beta bioactivity measurement with a single MxA mRNA measurement for screening and a second measurement before and after IFN beta administration for definite confirmation of IFN beta bioactivity status.
In 79 MS patients MxA mRNA expression was determined 4 hours after IFN beta administration. If inadequate, MxA mRNA expression testing was repeated 3 months afterwards, comparing post- and pre injection samples to determine whether IFNb bioactivity was persistently lacking. MxA mRNA expression was compared to NA beta titres, determined by the cytopathic effect assay (CPE).
NAb titres correlated significantly with MxA mRNA expression and MxA mRNA induction. Of all screened patients, only one patient had adequate MxA mRNA expression and high NAb titres simultaneously. Of the biological non-responders at second measurement (21/55), 17 (81%) were high-titre NAb positive, 1 (5%) was low-titre NAb positive and 3 (14%) were NAb negative. Without considering the pre-injection measurement, two more NAb negative patients would have tested negative for IFN beta bioactivity, emphasizing the need of a pre-injection sample.
Our data suggest that for IFN beta bioactivity screening a single post-injection measurement seems reasonable. However, MxA induction measurement based on both pre- and post-IFN beta injection samples at second measurement is somewhat more precise in determining ultimate IFN beta bioactivity status.
针对干扰素β(IFNβ)的中和抗体(NAb)与IFNβ在多发性硬化症(MS)中的生物活性降低及疗效相关。目前尚不清楚如何在临床实践中应用IFNβ生物活性检测(黏液病毒抗性蛋白A(MxA)mRNA定量)。
评估单次MxA mRNA检测用于筛查以及在IFNβ给药前后进行第二次检测以明确确认IFNβ生物活性状态的IFNβ生物活性检测的价值和可行性。
在79例MS患者中,于IFNβ给药后4小时测定MxA mRNA表达。如果结果不理想,3个月后重复进行MxA mRNA表达检测,比较注射后和注射前的样本以确定是否持续缺乏IFNβ生物活性。将MxA mRNA表达与通过细胞病变效应测定法(CPE)确定的NAb滴度进行比较。
NAb滴度与MxA mRNA表达及MxA mRNA诱导显著相关。在所有筛查的患者中,只有1例患者同时具有足够的MxA mRNA表达和高NAb滴度。在第二次检测时生物学无反应者(21/55)中,17例(81%)为高滴度NAb阳性,1例(5%)为低滴度NAb阳性,3例(14%)为NAb阴性。不考虑注射前检测时,另有2例NAb阴性患者的IFNβ生物活性检测结果会为阴性,这强调了需要注射前样本。
我们的数据表明,对于IFNβ生物活性筛查,单次注射后检测似乎是合理的。然而,在第二次检测时基于IFNβ注射前和注射后样本进行的MxA诱导检测在确定最终IFNβ生物活性状态方面更为精确。