Takahashi Yutaka, Chai John, Tan Swee-Chian
Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan.
Dent Mater. 2006 Mar;22(3):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.035. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
The effect of water sorption on the impact strengths of two pre-impregnated fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) and one impregnated FRC were studied. All FRCs were available clinically.
Eight 1.0 mm x 2.0 mm x 25.0mm bar-shaped specimens of each material were prepared according to manufacturers' instructions. The impact strength of each specimen was tested (adoption from ISO 179-1 Plastics-Determination of Charpy impact properties) after the specimens were immersed in 23.0+/-1 degrees C distilled water for seven, 60 and 180 days. The data were analyzed using the Weibull method. Scanning electron micrographs were taken to examine the mode of failure.
Weibull analysis of the B10 strength of the FRCs showed that the difference in impact strength for each FRC due to the duration of water immersion was not significant (P>0.05). The impact strength of pre-impregnated E-glass FRC (Vectris) (75 kJ/m(2)) was not significantly different from the pre-impregnated S-glass FRC (FiberKor) (66 kJ/m(2)) (P>0.05). The impregnated FRC possessed impact strength (42 kJ/m(2)) that was not significantly different from the pre-impregnated S-glass FRC but was significantly lower than the pre-impregnated E-glass FRC. x100 SEMs of the three types of FRC specimens revealed fiber failure to be the predominant mode of failure.
Water immersion up to 180 days duration did not significantly affect the impact strength of three FRCs. The impact strength of the impregnated FRC was not significantly different from the pre-impregnated S-glass FRC but was significantly lower than the pre-impregnated E-glass FRC.
研究吸水率对两种预浸纤维增强复合材料(FRC)和一种浸渍FRC冲击强度的影响。所有FRC在临床上均可获得。
根据制造商的说明,为每种材料制备8个1.0毫米×2.0毫米×25.0毫米的条形试样。将试样浸入23.0±1摄氏度的蒸馏水中7天、60天和180天后,测试每个试样的冲击强度(采用ISO 179-1《塑料-夏比冲击性能的测定》)。使用威布尔方法分析数据。拍摄扫描电子显微镜照片以检查破坏模式。
FRC的B10强度的威布尔分析表明,每种FRC的冲击强度因水浸持续时间的差异不显著(P>0.05)。预浸E玻璃FRC(Vectris)的冲击强度(75 kJ/m²)与预浸S玻璃FRC(FiberKor)的冲击强度(66 kJ/m²)无显著差异(P>0.05)。浸渍FRC的冲击强度(42 kJ/m²)与预浸S玻璃FRC无显著差异,但显著低于预浸E玻璃FRC。三种类型FRC试样的100倍扫描电子显微镜照片显示纤维破坏是主要的破坏模式。
长达180天的水浸对三种FRC的冲击强度没有显著影响。浸渍FRC的冲击强度与预浸S玻璃FRC无显著差异,但显著低于预浸E玻璃FRC。