Borritz Marianne, Rugulies Reiner, Bjorner Jakob B, Villadsen Ebbe, Mikkelsen Ole A, Kristensen Tage S
National Institute of Occupational Health, Denmark.
Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(1):49-58. doi: 10.1080/14034940510032275.
To present the theoretical framework, design, methods, and baseline findings of the first Danish study on determinants and consequences of burnout, and the impact of workplace interventions in human service work organizations.
A 5-year prospective intervention study comprising 2,391 employees from different organizations in the human service sector: social security offices, psychiatric prison, institutions for severely disabled, hospitals, and homecare services. Data were collected at baseline and at two follow-ups. The authors developed a new burnout tool (the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory) covering work-related, client-related, and personal burnout. The study includes potential determinants of burnout (e.g. the psychosocial work environment, social relations outside work, lifestyle factors, and personality aspects) and consequences of burnout (e.g. poor health, low job satisfaction, turnover, and absenteeism). Here, the focus is on the description of the study population at baseline, including associations of work burnout with psychosocial work environment scales and absence.
Response rate at baseline was 80.1%. Midwives and homecare workers had high levels on both work- and client-related burnout. Prison officers had the highest level on client-related burnout. Supervisors and office assistants had low levels on both scales. Work burnout showed the highest correlations with job satisfaction (r = -0.51), quantitative demands (r = 0.48), role-conflicts (r = 0.44), and emotional demands (r = 0.42). Sickness absence was 13.9 vs 6.0 days among participants in the highest and lowest work burnout quartile, respectively.
The findings indicate that study design and methods are adequate for the upcoming prospective analyses of aetiology and consequences of burnout and of the impact of workplace interventions.
介绍丹麦首项关于职业倦怠的决定因素、后果以及工作场所干预措施对人类服务工作组织影响的研究的理论框架、设计、方法和基线研究结果。
一项为期5年的前瞻性干预研究,涵盖了来自人类服务部门不同组织的2391名员工:社会保障办公室、精神病监狱、重度残疾人机构、医院和家庭护理服务机构。在基线和两次随访时收集数据。作者开发了一种新的职业倦怠工具(哥本哈根职业倦怠量表),涵盖与工作相关、与客户相关和个人职业倦怠。该研究包括职业倦怠的潜在决定因素(如心理社会工作环境、工作之外的社会关系、生活方式因素和个性方面)以及职业倦怠的后果(如健康不佳、工作满意度低、离职和旷工)。在此,重点是对基线时研究人群的描述,包括工作倦怠与心理社会工作环境量表及缺勤之间的关联。
基线时的回复率为80.1%。助产士和家庭护理人员在与工作和客户相关的职业倦怠方面得分较高。狱警在与客户相关的职业倦怠方面得分最高。主管和办公室助理在两个量表上的得分都较低。工作倦怠与工作满意度(r = -0.51)、工作量要求(r = 0.48)、角色冲突(r = 0.44)和情感要求(r = 0.42)的相关性最高。工作倦怠得分处于最高和最低四分位数的参与者的病假天数分别为13.9天和6.0天。
研究结果表明,该研究设计和方法足以用于即将开展的关于职业倦怠的病因、后果以及工作场所干预措施影响的前瞻性分析。