University of Turku, Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 7 (Publicum building), 20014 Turku, Finland.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Sep 1;50(6):456-465. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4171. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
This study aimed to investigate (i) the risk of work disability (>10-day sickness absence spell or disability pension) due to common mental disorders (CMD) among social workers compared with other health and social care, education, and non-human service professionals and (ii) whether the risk was mediated by job stress.
A cohort of 16 306 public sector professionals in Finland was followed using survey data from baseline (2004 or if not available, 2008) on job stress [job strain or effort-reward imbalance (ERI)] and register data on work disability due to CMD from baseline through 2011. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the risk of work disability due to CMD between three occupation-pairs in a counterfactual setting, controlling for age, sex, job contract, body mass index, alcohol risk use, smoking, and physical inactivity.
Social workers' job stress was at higher level only when compared to education professionals. Thus, the mediation hypothesis was analyzed comparing social workers to education professionals. Social workers had a higher risk of work disability due to CMD compared with education professionals [hazard ratio (HR) 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58-2.74]. This HR was partly mediated by job strain (24%) and ERI (12%). Social workers had a higher risk of work disability than non-human service professionals (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.09), but not compared with other health and social care professionals.
Job stress partly mediated the excess risk of work disability among social workers only in comparison with education professionals.
本研究旨在调查(i)与其他健康和社会护理、教育和非人类服务专业人员相比,社会工作者因常见精神障碍(CMD)而导致工作残疾(>10 天病假或残疾抚恤金)的风险,以及(ii)这种风险是否受到工作压力的影响。
在芬兰,对 16306 名公共部门专业人员进行了队列研究,使用基线(2004 年,如果没有,则为 2008 年)的调查数据,调查工作压力[工作紧张或努力-回报失衡(ERI)]和从基线到 2011 年因 CMD 导致的工作残疾的登记数据。采用 Cox 比例风险模型,在对照假设的情况下,对三种职业对之间因 CMD 导致工作残疾的风险进行分析,控制年龄、性别、劳动合同、体重指数、酒精风险使用、吸烟和身体活动不足。
社会工作者的工作压力仅与教育专业人员相比处于较高水平。因此,在比较社会工作者和教育专业人员时,对中介假设进行了分析。与教育专业人员相比,社会工作者因 CMD 而导致工作残疾的风险更高[风险比(HR)2.08,95%置信区间(CI)1.58-2.74]。该 HR 部分由工作紧张(24%)和 ERI(12%)介导。与非人类服务专业人员相比,社会工作者因工作残疾的风险更高(HR 1.54,95% CI 1.13-2.09),但与其他健康和社会护理专业人员相比则没有。
仅与教育专业人员相比,工作压力部分解释了社会工作者工作残疾风险增加的原因。