Suppr超能文献

两种酒精临床研究所戒断评估版本的比较:CIWA-Ar和CIWA-AD。

A comparison of two versions of the clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol: the CIWA-Ar and CIWA-AD.

作者信息

Reoux Joseph P, Oreskovich Michael R

机构信息

VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington 98108, USA.

出版信息

Am J Addict. 2006 Jan-Feb;15(1):85-93. doi: 10.1080/10550490500419136.

Abstract

Scores from two versions of the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, the CIWA-Ar and CIWA-AD, were compared in 135 alcohol detoxification episodes. The paired mean score for withdrawal severity was statistically higher with the CIWA-AD (p < 0.001), but the mean difference of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.38-0.53, t = 11.74) is not likely to be clinically significant. The difference in the total score between the two scales was 1 point or less 82.6% of the time, and nearly all (97.7%) of the CIWA-AD scores were within 3 points of the paired CIWA-Ar score (range - 6 to + 6).

摘要

在135例酒精解毒过程中,对两种版本的酒精临床研究所戒断评估量表(CIWA-Ar和CIWA-AD)的评分进行了比较。CIWA-AD的戒断严重程度配对平均得分在统计学上更高(p < 0.001),但平均差异为0.45(95%置信区间:0.38 - 0.53,t = 11.74),在临床上可能不具有显著意义。两个量表总分的差异在82.6%的时间里为1分或更低,并且几乎所有(97.7%)的CIWA-AD评分都在配对的CIWA-Ar评分的3分范围内(范围为 - 6至 + 6)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验