Reoux Joseph P, Oreskovich Michael R
VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington 98108, USA.
Am J Addict. 2006 Jan-Feb;15(1):85-93. doi: 10.1080/10550490500419136.
Scores from two versions of the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, the CIWA-Ar and CIWA-AD, were compared in 135 alcohol detoxification episodes. The paired mean score for withdrawal severity was statistically higher with the CIWA-AD (p < 0.001), but the mean difference of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.38-0.53, t = 11.74) is not likely to be clinically significant. The difference in the total score between the two scales was 1 point or less 82.6% of the time, and nearly all (97.7%) of the CIWA-AD scores were within 3 points of the paired CIWA-Ar score (range - 6 to + 6).
在135例酒精解毒过程中，对两种版本的酒精临床研究所戒断评估量表（CIWA-Ar和CIWA-AD）的评分进行了比较。CIWA-AD的戒断严重程度配对平均得分在统计学上更高（p < 0.001），但平均差异为0.45（95%置信区间：0.38 - 0.53，t = 11.74），在临床上可能不具有显著意义。两个量表总分的差异在82.6%的时间里为1分或更低，并且几乎所有（97.7%）的CIWA-AD评分都在配对的CIWA-Ar评分的3分范围内（范围为 - 6至 + 6）。
