Suppr超能文献

将1992年庞贝等人鉴定的淡黄肠球菌重新分类为1984年柯林斯等人鉴定的(源自1979年沃恩等人鉴定)格氏肠球菌的晚出同物异名,以及将2004年万卡内伊特等人鉴定的嗜糖肠球菌重新分类为2004年福尔蒂纳等人鉴定的意大利肠球菌的晚出同物异名。

Reclassification of Enterococcus flavescens Pompei et al. 1992 as a later synonym of Enterococcus casseliflavus (ex Vaughan et al. 1979) Collins et al. 1984 and Enterococcus saccharominimus Vancanneyt et al. 2004 as a later synonym of Enterococcus italicus Fortina et al. 2004.

作者信息

Naser Sabri M, Vancanneyt Marc, Hoste Bart, Snauwaert Cindy, Vandemeulebroecke Katrien, Swings Jean

机构信息

BCCMTM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Ghent University, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, Ghent 9000, Belgium.

Laboratory of Microbiology, Ghent University, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, Ghent 9000, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 Feb;56(Pt 2):413-416. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63891-0.

Abstract

The taxonomic relatedness between the species Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus flavescens and between Enterococcus italicus and Enterococcus saccharominimus was investigated. Literature data had already indicated the synonymy between E. casseliflavus and E. flavescens, but this observation had not been formally published. Additional evidence that the two taxa represent a single species was provided by comparison of the partial sequences for three housekeeping genes, phenylalanyl-tRNA synthase alpha subunit (pheS), RNA polymerase alpha subunit (rpoA) and the alpha subunit of ATP synthase (atpA). Additional genomic data derived from DNA-DNA hybridization demonstrated that the two species are synonymous. For E. italicus and E. saccharominimus, two recently described taxa, a high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of >99% and analogous phenotypic features indicated a close taxonomic relatedness. The same multilocus sequence analysis scheme for the three housekeeping genes was also applied for E. italicus and E. saccharominimus and indicated possible conspecificity, an observation that was also confirmed by a high DNA-DNA hybridization value (>or=78%). Data from the present study led to the proposal that E. flavescens should be reclassified as a later synonym of E. casseliflavus and that E. saccharominimus should be reclassified as a later synonym of E. italicus.

摘要

研究了格氏肠球菌和微黄肠球菌之间以及意大利肠球菌和嗜糖肠球菌之间的分类学相关性。文献数据已经表明格氏肠球菌和微黄肠球菌是同物异名,但这一观察结果尚未正式发表。通过比较三个管家基因(苯丙氨酰 - tRNA合成酶α亚基(pheS)、RNA聚合酶α亚基(rpoA)和ATP合酶α亚基(atpA))的部分序列,提供了这两个分类单元代表单一物种的额外证据。来自DNA - DNA杂交的其他基因组数据表明这两个物种是同物异名。对于最近描述的两个分类单元意大利肠球菌和嗜糖肠球菌,16S rRNA基因序列相似度>99%且具有相似的表型特征,表明它们在分类学上密切相关。同样的三个管家基因多位点序列分析方案也应用于意大利肠球菌和嗜糖肠球菌,结果表明它们可能是同种,这一观察结果也通过高DNA - DNA杂交值(≥78%)得到证实。本研究的数据导致提议将微黄肠球菌重新分类为格氏肠球菌的晚出同物异名,将嗜糖肠球菌重新分类为意大利肠球菌的晚出同物异名。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验