Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌预后标志物的细胞学评估

Cytologic evaluation of prognostic markers in breast carcinoma.

作者信息

Jayaram Gita, Elsayed Elnazir Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2005 Nov-Dec;49(6):605-10. doi: 10.1159/000326247.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

To type breast carcinomaon on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) material and correlate the results with histologic typing, to grade breast carcinoma on FNAC material and correlate the findings with Bloom-Richardson histologic grading, and to determine the estrogen receptor (ER) status in cases of breast carcinoma by immunocytochemical (ICC) staining of FNA cytologic material and correlate the findings with ER status, as determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of tissue sections.

STUDY DESIGN

Seventy-seven cases of breast carcinoma diagnosed on FNAC formed the basis of this study. Typing was done in all cases on the basis of cytologic features and grading in 62. (Fifteen cases were special types of breast carcinoma). In all cases, ER status was determined by immunostaining of cytologic smears. Results of tumor typing, grading and ER status on cytologic material were compared with the results of histologic typing, grading and immunostaining of histologic material obtained from mastectomy or wide excision specimens.

RESULTS

Tumor typing was accurate in 73 of 77 cases (94.8%). Fifteen of 18 cases that were cytologically grade 3 were confirmed on histology, while 3 proved to be grade 2. Of 40 cytologic grade 2 cases, 26 were confirmed on histology, while 14 cases were grade 3. Three of 4 cytologically grade 1 cases were confirmed on histology while 1 was grade 2. The overall accuracy for cytologic grading was 71% (44 of 62 cases). Thirty-seven of 40 ER-positive cases (92.5%) were labeled ER positive on ICC. One case was ER negative on cytology, while in 2 cases the cellularity of the cytologic smear was insufficient to assess ER expression. Thirty-seven cases were negativefor ER on IHC. Nine of these showed ER positivity on ICC, 26 were negative, and 2 had cellularity that was inadequate for assessment of ER. Sensitivity and specificity rates for ER detection on ICC were 97.4% and 74.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Tumor typing, grading and evaluation of ER status on FNA C material in breast carcinomas are simple, quick and moderately reliable techniques that compare and correlate favorably with histologic typing, grading and ER status on IHC.

摘要

未标注

对细针穿刺抽吸细胞学(FNAC)材料进行乳腺癌分型,并将结果与组织学分型相关联;对FNAC材料进行乳腺癌分级,并将结果与布鲁姆-理查森组织学分级相关联;通过对FNA细胞学材料进行免疫细胞化学(ICC)染色来确定乳腺癌病例中的雌激素受体(ER)状态,并将结果与通过组织切片免疫组织化学(IHC)染色确定的ER状态相关联。

研究设计

本研究以77例经FNAC诊断的乳腺癌病例为基础。所有病例均根据细胞学特征进行分型,62例进行分级(15例为特殊类型的乳腺癌)。所有病例均通过对细胞学涂片进行免疫染色来确定ER状态。将细胞学材料上的肿瘤分型、分级和ER状态结果与从乳房切除术或广泛切除标本获得的组织学材料的组织学分型、分级和免疫染色结果进行比较。

结果

77例中有73例(94.8%)肿瘤分型准确。18例细胞学3级病例中有15例经组织学证实,3例为2级。40例细胞学2级病例中,26例经组织学证实,14例为3级。4例细胞学1级病例中有3例经组织学证实,1例为2级。细胞学分级的总体准确率为71%(62例中的44例)。40例ER阳性病例中有37例(92.5%)在ICC上标记为ER阳性。1例细胞学ER阴性,2例细胞学涂片细胞数量不足,无法评估ER表达。37例IHC检测ER阴性。其中9例ICC检测显示ER阳性,26例阴性,2例细胞数量不足以评估ER。ICC检测ER的敏感性和特异性分别为97.4%和74.3%。

结论

对乳腺癌的FNAC材料进行肿瘤分型、分级和ER状态评估是简单、快速且具有一定可靠性的技术,与IHC的组织学分型、分级和ER状态相比,具有良好的可比性和相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验