• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌细针穿刺物分级及激素受体免疫染色的评估

Evaluation of grading and hormone receptor immunostaining on fine needle aspirates in carcinoma breast.

作者信息

Handa Uma, Kumar Amit, Kundu Reetu, Dalal Usha, Mohan Harsh

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Cytol. 2015 Jan-Mar;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.155222.

DOI:10.4103/0970-9371.155222
PMID:25948935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4408669/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Grading and hormone receptor determination in breast carcinoma are predictive factors for response to hormonal therapy.

AIM

This study was undertaken to grade breast carcinoma and to determine estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Furthermore, the objective was to compare the results with histological grading and immunohistochemistry on surgical material.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty cases of breast carcinoma diagnosed on FNAC were included. The cytological grading was done according to the Robinson's grading system. The corresponding histology sections were graded using the modified Bloom-Richardson system. Immunostaining for ER and PR was done on smears and tissue sections.

RESULTS

On both cytological and histological evaluation, 49 cases were infiltrating ductal carcinoma and one case was colloid carcinoma. On comparing cytological and histological grading, 78% were correctly graded on cytology. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for ER detection on immunocytochemistry (ICC) were 55.6%, 95%, 93.8% and 61.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for PR detection on ICC were 57.7%, 95.2%, 93.8% and 64.5%, respectively. The correlation for ER and PR between cytology and histology was 72.3% and 74.5%.

CONCLUSION

The grading along with ER and PR immunostaining of breast carcinoma on smears is advocated because of high concordance between cytology and histology. This allows the patient to be treated with hormonal therapy on the basis of FNAC alone.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌的分级及激素受体测定是激素治疗反应的预测因素。

目的

本研究旨在对乳腺癌进行分级,并在细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)中测定雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)的表达。此外,目的是将结果与手术材料的组织学分级及免疫组化结果进行比较。

材料与方法

纳入50例经FNAC诊断为乳腺癌的病例。细胞学分级根据罗宾逊分级系统进行。相应的组织学切片使用改良的布鲁姆-理查森系统进行分级。对涂片和组织切片进行ER和PR免疫染色。

结果

在细胞学和组织学评估中,49例为浸润性导管癌,1例为黏液癌。比较细胞学和组织学分级时,78%在细胞学上分级正确。免疫细胞化学(ICC)检测ER的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为55.6%、95%、93.8%和61.3%。ICC检测PR的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为57.7%、95.2%、93.8%和64.5%。细胞学和组织学之间ER和PR的相关性分别为72.3%和74.5%。

结论

由于细胞学和组织学之间高度一致,提倡对涂片上的乳腺癌进行分级以及ER和PR免疫染色。这使得患者仅基于FNAC就可接受激素治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1e/4408669/2e12e4d4db23/JCytol-32-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1e/4408669/2e12e4d4db23/JCytol-32-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1e/4408669/2e12e4d4db23/JCytol-32-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of grading and hormone receptor immunostaining on fine needle aspirates in carcinoma breast.乳腺癌细针穿刺物分级及激素受体免疫染色的评估
J Cytol. 2015 Jan-Mar;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.155222.
2
Cytologic evaluation of prognostic markers in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌预后标志物的细胞学评估
Acta Cytol. 2005 Nov-Dec;49(6):605-10. doi: 10.1159/000326247.
3
Correlative Study of Cytological Features in Grading of Invasive Breast Carcinoma.浸润性乳腺癌分级中细胞学特征的相关性研究
J Cytol. 2018 Jul-Sep;35(3):149-152. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_2_18.
4
Correlation of Robinson's Cytological Grading with Elston and Ellis' Nottingham Modification of Bloom Richardson Score of Histopathology for Breast Carcinoma.罗宾逊细胞学分级与埃尔森和埃利斯对乳腺癌组织病理学布鲁姆-理查森评分的诺丁汉改良版之间的相关性。
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Mar;18(1):55-60. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.1.55.
5
Comparative evaluation of six cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌六种细胞学分级系统的比较评估
J Cytol. 2013 Apr;30(2):87-93. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.112647.
6
Correlative Evaluation of Seven Cytological 3-Tier Grading Systems of Breast Carcinoma with the Standard Histological Grading: A 4 and ½ Year Study.七种乳腺癌细胞学三阶梯分级系统与标准组织学分级的相关性评估:一项 4 年半的研究。
Acta Cytol. 2023;67(5):482-492. doi: 10.1159/000531463. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Robinson's cytological grading on aspirates of breast carcinoma: Correlation with Bloom Richardson's histological grading.罗宾逊对乳腺癌穿刺物的细胞学分级:与布鲁姆·理查森组织学分级的相关性。
J Cytol. 2009 Oct;26(4):140-3. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.62182.
8
Comparative evaluation of grading of breast carcinomas in fine needle aspirates by two methods.两种方法对细针穿刺抽吸所得乳腺癌分级的比较评估
Indian J Med Res. 2003 Dec;118:247-50.
9
Cytological grading of breast carcinoma on fine needle aspirates and its relation with histological grading.乳腺癌细针穿刺抽吸物的细胞学分级及其与组织学分级的关系。
South Asian J Cancer. 2015 Jan-Mar;4(1):32-4. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.149948.
10
Cytological grading of duct cell carcinoma, NOS of breast and its correlation with histological grading.乳腺导管细胞癌(非特殊类型)的细胞学分级及其与组织学分级的相关性
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2006 Aug;32(2):49-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytological Grading of Breast Carcinomas and Its Prognostic Implications.乳腺癌的细胞学分级及其预后意义
Cureus. 2022 Sep 20;14(9):e29385. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29385. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Performance of breast fine needle aspiration as an initial diagnostic tool: A large academic hospital experience.乳腺细针抽吸术作为初始诊断工具的性能:一家大型学术医院的经验。
Cytopathology. 2022 Nov;33(6):707-715. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13171. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3
Cytological Smear and Cell Block Versus Tissue Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Malignant Tumours in Non-Gynaecologic Specimens.

本文引用的文献

1
Hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status evaluation on ThinPrep specimens from breast carcinoma: correlation with histologic sections determination.液基薄层细胞学制片中乳腺癌激素受体和人表皮生长因子受体 2 状态的评估:与组织切片测定的相关性。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2012 Jun 25;120(3):196-205. doi: 10.1002/cncy.20206. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
2
Cytohistological correlation of grading in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌分级的细胞组织学相关性
Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Apr;39(4):251-7. doi: 10.1002/dc.21374.
3
Cytological grading of breast cancers and comparative evaluation of two grading systems.
非妇科标本中细胞学涂片和细胞块与组织活检在恶性肿瘤诊断中的比较
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 Sep;28(5):583-588. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i5.9.
4
Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in Breast Cancer: A Reappraisal Based on Retrospective Review of 698 Cases.乳腺癌的细针穿刺抽吸细胞学检查(FNAC):基于698例病例回顾性分析的重新评估
World J Surg. 2017 Jun;41(6):1528-1533. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3906-x.
乳腺癌的细胞学分级及两种分级系统的比较评估
J Cytol. 2010 Apr;27(2):55-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.70738.
4
Estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor status in breast carcinoma: comparison of immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry.乳腺癌中雌激素和孕激素受体状态:免疫细胞化学与免疫组织化学的比较
Indian J Cancer. 2010 Apr-Jun;47(2):148-50. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.63006.
5
Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast carcinomas: comparison on cell block, needle-core, and tissue block preparations.乳腺癌中雌激素受体、孕激素受体及人表皮生长因子受体2表达的免疫组化检测:细胞块、针芯活检及组织块标本的比较
Cancer. 2009 Aug 25;117(4):279-88. doi: 10.1002/cncy.20034.
6
Hormone receptors over the last 8 years in a cancer referral center in India: what was and what is?印度一家癌症转诊中心过去8年的激素受体情况:过去怎样,现在如何?
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2009 Apr-Jun;52(2):171-4. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.48909.
7
Correlation of HER-2 over-expression with clinico-pathological parameters in Tunisian breast carcinoma.突尼斯乳腺癌中HER-2过表达与临床病理参数的相关性
World J Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct 22;6:112. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-112.
8
Immunocytochemistry on scrape cytology in breast cancer: will it unearth the weaker positives?
Acta Cytol. 2006 May-Jun;50(3):284-90. doi: 10.1159/000325955.
9
Cytologic evaluation of prognostic markers in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌预后标志物的细胞学评估
Acta Cytol. 2005 Nov-Dec;49(6):605-10. doi: 10.1159/000326247.
10
Immunohistochemical evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast carcinoma in Jordan.约旦乳腺癌中人表皮生长因子受体2及雌激素和孕激素受体的免疫组织化学评估
Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(5):R598-604. doi: 10.1186/bcr1200. Epub 2005 May 24.