Gable Shelly L
UCLA Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA.
J Pers. 2006 Feb;74(1):175-222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x.
It was predicted that approach social motives and goals would be linked to outcomes characterized by the presence of positive social features, and avoidance social motives and goals would be linked to outcomes characterized by the presence of negative social features and that the link between approach motives and outcomes would be mediated by different processes than the link between avoidance motives and outcomes. These hypotheses were examined in three studies (two of them longitudinal) that measured participants' dispositional social motives, short-term social goals, and social outcomes (e.g., loneliness). Approach motives and goals were reliably associated with less loneliness and more satisfaction with social bonds, whereas avoidance motives and goals were reliably associated with more loneliness, negative social attitudes, and relationship insecurity. Results also suggested that these associations were mediated by different processes. Implications for the conceptualization of close relationships along these two dimensions are discussed.
研究预测,趋近型社会动机和目标将与具有积极社会特征的结果相关联,回避型社会动机和目标将与具有消极社会特征的结果相关联,并且趋近型动机与结果之间的联系将由与回避型动机与结果之间的联系不同的过程介导。在三项研究(其中两项为纵向研究)中检验了这些假设,这些研究测量了参与者的特质性社会动机、短期社会目标和社会结果(例如孤独感)。趋近型动机和目标与较少的孤独感以及对社会关系更多的满意度可靠地相关,而回避型动机和目标与更多的孤独感、消极的社会态度和关系不安全感可靠地相关。结果还表明,这些关联是由不同的过程介导的。讨论了沿着这两个维度对亲密关系进行概念化的意义。