Suppr超能文献

个体学习风格是否会影响在混合学习环境中选择使用基于网络的心电图学习计划?

Does individual learning styles influence the choice to use a web-based ECG learning programme in a blended learning setting?

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2012 Jan 16;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The compressed curriculum in modern knowledge-intensive medicine demands useful tools to achieve approved learning aims in a limited space of time. Web-based learning can be used in different ways to enhance learning. Little is however known regarding its optimal utilisation. Our aim was to investigate if the individual learning styles of medical students influence the choice to use a web-based ECG learning programme in a blended learning setting.

METHODS

The programme, with three types of modules (learning content, self-assessment questions and interactive ECG interpretation training), was offered on a voluntary basis during a face to face ECG learning course for undergraduate medical students. The Index of Learning Styles (ILS) and a general questionnaire including questions about computer and Internet usage, preferred future speciality and prior experience of E-learning were used to explore different factors related to the choice of using the programme or not.

RESULTS

93 (76%) out of 123 students answered the ILS instrument and 91 the general questionnaire. 55 students (59%) were defined as users of the web-based ECG-interpretation programme. Cronbach's alpha was analysed with coefficients above 0.7 in all of the four dimensions of ILS. There were no significant differences with regard to learning styles, as assessed by ILS, between the user and non-user groups; Active/Reflective; Visual/Verbal; Sensing/Intuitive; and Sequential/Global (p = 0.56-0.96). Neither did gender, prior experience of E-learning or preference for future speciality differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Among medical students, neither learning styles according to ILS, nor a number of other characteristics seem to influence the choice to use a web-based ECG programme. This finding was consistent also when the usage of the different modules in the programme were considered. Thus, the findings suggest that web-based learning may attract a broad variety of medical students.

摘要

背景

现代知识密集型医学的压缩课程要求有用的工具,以在有限的时间内达到认可的学习目标。网络学习可以以不同的方式用于增强学习。然而,关于其最佳利用的知识却知之甚少。我们的目的是调查医学生的个体学习风格是否会影响他们在混合学习环境中选择使用基于网络的心电图学习计划。

方法

该计划提供了三种类型的模块(学习内容、自我评估问题和交互式心电图解释训练),作为面授心电图学习课程的一部分,供本科医学生自愿参加。使用学习风格指数(ILS)和一般问卷,包括有关计算机和互联网使用、首选未来专业以及之前的电子学习经验的问题,来探讨与选择使用或不使用该计划相关的不同因素。

结果

在 123 名学生中,有 93 名(76%)回答了 ILS 工具,91 名回答了一般问卷。有 55 名学生(59%)被定义为基于网络的心电图解释程序的使用者。ILS 的所有四个维度的 Cronbach's alpha 分析系数均高于 0.7。在用户和非用户组之间,ILS 评估的学习风格没有显著差异;活跃/反思;视觉/语言;感觉/直觉;以及顺序/全局(p=0.56-0.96)。性别、之前的电子学习经验或对未来专业的偏好也没有在组间存在差异。

结论

在医学生中,ILS 评估的学习风格,以及其他一些特征似乎都不会影响使用基于网络的心电图程序的选择。当考虑到计划中不同模块的使用时,这一发现也是一致的。因此,这些发现表明,基于网络的学习可能会吸引各种各样的医学生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e8/3277483/c26002cdb2a0/1472-6920-12-5-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验