Southern Elizabeth N, McCombs Gayle B, Tolle S Lynn, Marinak Ken
J Dent Hyg. 2006 Winter;80(1):12. Epub 2006 Jan 1.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of two oral rinses-one 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse (CHX) and one herbal rinse (HBR)-on gingival health status over time.
Sixty-three participants were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: CHX, HBR, or placebo. For three months, participants rinsed twice daily (morning and evening) with (1/2) ounce of allocated rinse after brushing and flossing. Individuals were given the same type of soft bristle toothbrush and whitening toothpaste. No attempt was made to modify participants' routine oral care, except they were advised to refrain from use of any other oral rinse for the duration of the study. Data were collected at baseline (B), month one (1), two (2), and three (3) utilizing the Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BOP). A full mouth periodontal probing was performed at baseline and at the completion of the study. A soft tissue oral assessment was completed at each visit. CHX, HBR, and placebo data were compared between three time intervals, B-1, B-2, and B-3. Statistical analysis was conducted by means of multiple regression using generalized linear models. Paired comparison tests--ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey test--were used to confirm results.
CHX was the only oral rinse to demonstrate a statistically significant effect on the reduction of mean GI, BOP, and PI scores when compared to placebo. CHX demonstrated a 31% reduction in the proportion of GI scores between B-2 and a 29% reduction between B-3 (p=.003 and p=.012, respectively). CHX demonstrated a 19% reduction of BOP sites between B-1, 32% reduction between B-2, and 29% reduction between B-3 (p=.028, p=.000, and p=.005, respectively). CHX demonstrated a 20% reduction in PI scores between B-1, and a 28% reduction between B-2 (p=.005 and p=.032, respectively). The effects of HBR on reducing mean GI, BOP, and PI scores were not statistically greater than placebo at any time during the study.
本研究旨在确定两种口腔含漱液——一种0.12%氯己定含漱液(CHX)和一种草药含漱液(HBR)——随时间推移对牙龈健康状况的影响。
63名参与者被随机分配到三个治疗组之一:CHX组、HBR组或安慰剂组。为期三个月,参与者在刷牙和使用牙线后,每天早晚用(1/2)盎司分配的含漱液漱口。为参与者提供相同类型的软毛牙刷和美白牙膏。除了建议参与者在研究期间避免使用任何其他口腔含漱液外,未尝试改变参与者的日常口腔护理。在基线(B)、第1个月(1)、第2个月(2)和第3个月(3)收集数据,使用牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)和探诊出血(BOP)。在基线和研究结束时进行全口牙周探诊。每次就诊时完成软组织口腔评估。比较CHX组、HBR组和安慰剂组在三个时间间隔(B - 1、B - 2和B - 3)的数据。采用广义线性模型通过多元回归进行统计分析。使用配对比较检验——方差分析(ANOVA)后进行事后Tukey检验——来确认结果。
与安慰剂相比,CHX是唯一一种对降低平均GI、BOP和PI评分有统计学显著效果的口腔含漱液。CHX在B - 2至B - 3期间GI评分比例降低了31%,在B - 3时降低了29%(分别为p = 0.003和p = 0.012)。CHX在B - 1至B - 3期间BOP部位减少了19%,在B - 2至B - 3期间减少了32%,在B - 3时减少了29%(分别为p = 0.028、p = 0.000和p = 0.005)。CHX在B - 1至B - 2期间PI评分降低了20%,在B - 2时降低了28%(分别为p = 0.005和p = 0.03)。在研究期间的任何时候,HBR对降低平均GI、BOP和PI评分的效果在统计学上均不大于安慰剂。