Suppr超能文献

在工作场所检测气道阻塞和受限方面,用第6秒用力呼气容积(FEV6)替代用力肺活量(FVC)。

FEV6 as a surrogate for FVC in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in the workplace.

作者信息

Akpinar-Elci M, Fedan K B, Enright P L

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2006 Feb;27(2):374-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00081305.

Abstract

Compared with measurements of forced vital capacity (FVC), using the forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV(6)) reduces test time and frustration. It was hypothesised that using FEV(6) in the workplace setting would result in an acceptably low misclassification rate for detecting airways obstruction and spirometry-defined restriction when compared with using the traditional FVC. Experienced technicians from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health performed spirometry using dry rolling-seal spirometers as per American Thoracic Society guidelines in four workplace investigations. Airways obstruction was defined as an FEV(1)/FVC % below the lower limit of normal (LLN) using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III reference equations. Restriction was defined as an FVC below the LLN with a normal FEV(1)/FVC %. These "gold standard" definitions were compared with definitions based on FEV(6) (obstruction: FEV(1)/FEV(6) below the LLN; restriction: FEV(6) below the LLN with a normal FEV(1)/FEV(6)). The median (range) age of the 1,139 workers was 37 yrs (18-71 yrs) and 51.4% were male. A significantly high overall agreement was obtained between the two definitions. In conclusion, the current results confirm that forced expiratory volume in six seconds can be used as a surrogate for forced vital capacity in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in workers, although with some misclassification when compared to obtaining American Thoracic Society-acceptable manoeuvres of longer duration.

摘要

与用力肺活量(FVC)测量相比,使用6秒用力呼气容积(FEV(6))可减少测试时间和挫败感。研究假设,在工作场所环境中使用FEV(6)时,与使用传统的FVC相比,检测气道阻塞和肺量计定义的受限的错误分类率会低至可接受水平。美国国家职业安全与健康研究所的经验丰富的技术人员在四项工作场所调查中,按照美国胸科学会指南,使用干式滚动密封肺量计进行肺量测定。气道阻塞定义为使用第三次国家健康和营养检查调查参考方程得出的FEV(1)/FVC%低于正常下限(LLN)。受限定义为FVC低于LLN且FEV(1)/FVC正常。将这些“金标准”定义与基于FEV(6)的定义进行比较(气道阻塞:FEV(1)/FEV(6)低于LLN;受限:FEV(6)低于LLN且FEV(1)/FEV(6)正常)。1139名工人的年龄中位数(范围)为37岁(18 - 71岁),其中51.4%为男性。两种定义之间获得了显著较高的总体一致性。总之,当前结果证实,6秒用力呼气容积可作为用力肺活量的替代指标,用于检测工人的气道阻塞和受限,尽管与获得美国胸科学会认可的较长持续时间的操作相比,存在一些错误分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验