Suppr超能文献

纤维肌痛的补充和替代医学疗法

Complementary and alternative medical therapies in fibromyalgia.

作者信息

Sarac Aysegul Jale, Gur Ali

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12(1):47-57.

Abstract

This article describes the studies that have been performed evaluating complementary or alternative medical (CAM) therapies for efficacy and some adverse events fibromyalgia (FM). There is no permanent cure for FM; therefore, adequate symptom control should be goal of treatment. Clinicians can choose from a variety of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic modalities. Unfortunately, controlled studies of most current treatments have failed to demonstrate sustained, clinically significant responses. CAM has gained increasing popularity, particularly among individuals with FM for which traditional medicine has generally been ineffective. Some herbal and nutritional supplements (magnesium, S- adenosylmethionine) and massage therapy have the best evidence for effectiveness with FM. Other CAM therapies such as chlorella, biofeedback, relaxation have either been evaluated in only one randomised controlled trials (RCT) with positive results, in multiple RCTs with mixed results (magnet therapies) or have positive results from studies with methodological flaws (homeopathy, botanical oils, balneotherapy, anthocyanidins and dietary modifications). Another CAM therapy such as chiropractic care has neither well-designed studies nor positive results and is not currently recommended for FM treatment. Once CAM therapies have been better evaluated for safety and long-term efficacy in randomised, placebo-controlled trials, they may prove to be beneficial in treatments for FM. It would then be important to assess studies assessing cost-benefit analyses comparing conventional therapies and CAM.

摘要

本文介绍了为评估补充或替代医学(CAM)疗法对纤维肌痛(FM)的疗效及一些不良事件所开展的研究。FM尚无根治方法;因此,充分控制症状应是治疗的目标。临床医生可从多种药物和非药物治疗方式中进行选择。不幸的是,目前大多数治疗方法的对照研究均未能证明有持续的、具有临床意义的疗效。CAM越来越受欢迎,尤其是在FM患者中,而传统医学对这些患者通常效果不佳。一些草药和营养补充剂(镁、S-腺苷甲硫氨酸)以及按摩疗法对FM有效性的证据最为充分。其他CAM疗法,如小球藻、生物反馈、放松疗法,要么仅在一项随机对照试验(RCT)中进行了评估且结果为阳性,要么在多项RCT中结果不一(磁疗),要么在方法存在缺陷的研究中得出了阳性结果(顺势疗法、植物油、浴疗法、花青素和饮食调整)。另一种CAM疗法,如脊椎按摩疗法,既没有设计良好的研究,也没有阳性结果,目前不推荐用于FM治疗。一旦CAM疗法在随机、安慰剂对照试验中对安全性和长期疗效得到更好的评估,它们可能会被证明对FM治疗有益。届时,评估比较传统疗法和CAM的成本效益分析的研究将很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验