Porru S, Placidi Donatella, Scotto di Carlo A, Campagna M, Mariotti Orietta, Barbieri P G, Lombardi Sandra, Candela A, Tassi G F, Alessio L
Institute of Occupational Health, University of Brescia Italy.
Med Lav. 2005 Jul-Aug;96(4):312-29.
Firm scientific evidence supports the causal association between malignant mesothelioma (MM) and occupational exposure to asbestos. Risk attributable to occupation varies from 30 to 80% across different populations. The existence of a threshold level below which there is no risk of MM is still debated. A prompt and thorough assessment of exposure is essential to evaluate and manage MM cases, from diagnostic and epidemiological points of view.
To highlight the multiple areas of intervention by Occupational Physicians (OP) in MM evaluation and management, to describe an experience of OP in the province of Brescia.
The main areas of interest of the OP are exposure assessment, diagnosis (clinical, etiological), medico-legal issues, social consequences, preventive strategies, risk communication, scientific dispute/uncertainties. By means of an active search, the Brescia MM registry, managed by OP belonging to the local health authority observed 309 MM from 1977 to 2003; the local Institute of Occupational Health, hosted in a hospital of national relevance, evaluated about 200 MM in the last decade. The main outcomes of OP activity are the high percentage of direct interviews, individual case management, expert exposure assessment, etiological diagnosis, counselling, medico-legal assistance, better knowledge of occupational risks, enhanced cooperation among health professionals (oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, pneumologists, general practitioners and OP), important contribution to Registries and to epidemiology (estimates of attributable risks, incidence, survival rates), with positive social and scientific consequences (insurance agencies, trade union organizations, public events, teaching opportunities).
This experience highlights the multifaceted role of OP in active research and evaluation of MM cases, in the context of a multidisciplinary approach.
确凿的科学证据支持恶性间皮瘤(MM)与职业性接触石棉之间的因果关联。不同人群中职业所致风险在30%至80%之间。MM是否存在一个低于此水平就无风险的阈值仍存在争议。从诊断和流行病学角度来看,对接触情况进行及时、全面的评估对于MM病例的评估和管理至关重要。
强调职业医师(OP)在MM评估和管理中的多个干预领域,描述布雷西亚省职业医师的一项经验。
职业医师关注的主要领域包括接触评估、诊断(临床、病因学)、法医学问题、社会后果、预防策略、风险沟通、科学争议/不确定性。通过主动搜索,由当地卫生当局的职业医师管理的布雷西亚MM登记处从1977年至2003年观察到309例MM;位于一家具有全国影响力医院的当地职业健康研究所,在过去十年中评估了约200例MM。职业医师活动的主要成果包括高比例的直接访谈、个案管理、专家接触评估、病因学诊断、咨询、法医学援助、对职业风险的更好了解、卫生专业人员(肿瘤学家、病理学家、外科医生、肺病学家、全科医生和职业医师)之间加强合作、对登记处和流行病学的重要贡献(归因风险、发病率、生存率估计),以及产生积极的社会和科学影响(保险公司、工会组织、公共活动、教学机会)。
这一经验凸显了职业医师在多学科方法背景下对MM病例进行积极研究和评估的多方面作用。