• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强制接种疫苗以及出于良心或哲学原因的豁免:过去、现在和未来。

Compulsory vaccination and conscientious or philosophical exemptions: past, present, and future.

作者信息

Salmon Daniel A, Teret Stephen P, MacIntyre C Raina, Salisbury David, Burgess Margaret A, Halsey Neal A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2006 Feb 4;367(9508):436-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68144-0.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68144-0
PMID:16458770
Abstract

Compulsory vaccination has contributed to the success of immunisation programmes in the USA and Australia, yet the benefits from compulsory vaccination are not universally recognised. Some people--experts and the public alike--believe that the benefits of compulsory vaccination are outweighed by the associated ethical problems. A review of vaccination legislation in the UK, Australia, and the USA raises four main points. First, compulsory vaccination may be effective in preventing disease outbreaks, reaching and sustaining high immunisation coverage rates, and expediting the introduction of new vaccines. Second, to be effective, compulsory programmes must have a reliable supply of safe and effective vaccines and most people must be willing to be vaccinated. Third, allowance of exemptions to compulsory vaccination may limit public backlash. Finally, compulsory vaccination may increase the burden on governments to ensure the safety of vaccines. Nevertheless, although compulsory immunisation can be very effective, it might not be acceptable in some countries where high coverage has been achieved through other approaches or efforts, such as in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, and the UK. These factors should be considered when compulsory vaccinations are being introduced or immunisation laws refined. Lessons learned from compulsory vaccination could be useful to other public-health programmes.

摘要

强制接种疫苗对美国和澳大利亚免疫规划的成功起到了推动作用,然而强制接种疫苗的益处并未得到普遍认可。一些人——包括专家和公众——认为,强制接种疫苗的益处被相关的伦理问题所抵消。对英国、澳大利亚和美国疫苗接种立法的审查提出了四个要点。第一,强制接种疫苗可能在预防疾病爆发、实现并维持高免疫覆盖率以及加速新疫苗的引进方面有效。第二,要想有效,强制接种计划必须有安全有效的疫苗可靠供应,并且大多数人必须愿意接种。第三,允许对强制接种疫苗有豁免可能会减少公众的强烈反对。最后,强制接种疫苗可能会增加政府确保疫苗安全的负担。尽管如此,虽然强制免疫可能非常有效,但在一些通过其他途径或努力已实现高覆盖率的国家,如瑞典、挪威、丹麦、荷兰和英国,强制免疫可能并不被接受。在引入强制接种疫苗或完善免疫法时应考虑这些因素。从强制接种疫苗中吸取的经验教训可能对其他公共卫生项目有用。

相似文献

1
Compulsory vaccination and conscientious or philosophical exemptions: past, present, and future.强制接种疫苗以及出于良心或哲学原因的豁免:过去、现在和未来。
Lancet. 2006 Feb 4;367(9508):436-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68144-0.
2
Vanishing vaccinations: why are so many Americans opting out of vaccinating their children?逐渐消失的疫苗接种:为何如此多美国人选择不给孩子接种疫苗?
Univ Mich J Law Reform. 2004 Winter;37(2):353-440.
3
A Tale Of Two States: Mississippi, West Virginia, And Exemptions To Compulsory School Vaccination Laws.两个州的故事:密西西比州、西弗吉尼亚州与义务教育疫苗接种法的豁免情况
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Feb;35(2):348-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1172.
4
The Public Health Demand for Revoking Non-Medical Exemptions to Compulsory Vaccination Statutes.公共卫生对撤销非医学豁免强制接种法规的需求。
J Law Health. 2020;34(1):129-154.
5
[From the struggle for freedom to the denial of evidence: history of the anti-vaccination movements in Europe].[从争取自由到否认证据:欧洲反疫苗运动的历史]
Ann Ig. 2011 Mar-Apr;23(2):93-9.
6
Vaccine preventable diseases and vaccination coverage in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Australia 2003 to 2006.2003年至2006年澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民中的疫苗可预防疾病及疫苗接种覆盖率
Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2008 Jun;32 Suppl:S2-67.
7
From compulsory to voluntary immunisation: Italy's National Vaccination Plan (2005-7) and the ethical and organisational challenges facing public health policy-makers across Europe.从强制免疫到自愿免疫:意大利国家疫苗接种计划(2005 - 2007年)以及欧洲公共卫生政策制定者面临的伦理和组织挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):669-74. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022343.
8
MSJAMA. Uses of Jacobson v Massachusetts in the age of bioterror.《美国医学会杂志》。雅各布森诉马萨诸塞州案在生物恐怖时代的应用。
JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2331. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.17.2331.
9
[What vaccination has brought].[疫苗接种所带来的成果]
Rev Prat. 2004 Mar 15;54(5):482-8.
10
Fifty years of immunisation in Australia (1964-2014): the increasing opportunity to prevent diseases.澳大利亚五十年的免疫接种历程(1964 - 2014年):预防疾病的机会不断增加。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Jan;51(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12796.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescents' knowledge of and confidence in vaccines improves with board game play.通过玩棋盘游戏,青少年对疫苗的了解和信心有所提高。
Discov Educ. 2025;4(1):245. doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00683-4. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
2
Longitudinal association between parents' reported vaccination program preferences and children's actual immunization patterns in Shanghai, China.中国上海父母报告的疫苗接种计划偏好与儿童实际免疫模式之间的纵向关联。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22253-x.
3
Measles Vaccination Coverage and Anti-Measles Herd Immunity Levels in the World and WHO Regions Worsened from 2019 to 2023.
2019年至2023年期间,全球及世界卫生组织各区域的麻疹疫苗接种覆盖率和抗麻疹群体免疫水平有所恶化。
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;13(2):157. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13020157.
4
Impact of Australia's No Jab, No Pay policy on vaccination uptake - a before-after study in two national birth cohorts.澳大利亚“不接种,不付费”政策对疫苗接种率的影响——两项全国出生队列的前后对照研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Dec 5;54:101259. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101259. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Addressing vaccination gaps among healthcare workers in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of mandatory Hepatitis B vaccination.解决撒哈拉以南非洲地区医护人员的疫苗接种差距:强制性乙肝疫苗接种的作用。
Trop Med Health. 2024 Nov 6;52(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s41182-024-00652-x.
6
The implementation of a new measles vaccine mandate in Germany: A qualitative study in local health departments.德国实施新麻疹疫苗强制接种令:地方卫生部门的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0306003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306003. eCollection 2024.
7
Vaccination against COVID-19: the view of Brazilian federal judges.接种 COVID-19 疫苗:巴西联邦法官的观点。
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Apr 29;40(4):e00086823. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN086823. eCollection 2024.
8
Acute Pancreatitis Induced by COVID-19 Vaccine: A Systematic Review.新冠疫苗诱导的急性胰腺炎:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Mar 3;16(3):e55426. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55426. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Smallpox Geographies: vaccination, borders and Indigenous peoples in Australia's coastal north.天花的地域分布:澳大利亚北部沿海地区的疫苗接种、边界和原住民。
Med Hist. 2024 Jan;68(1):22-41. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2023.39. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
10
Spreading of misinformation on mass media and digital platforms regarding vaccines. A systematic scoping review on stakeholders, policymakers, and sentiments/behavior of Italian consumers.大众媒体和数字平台上有关疫苗的错误信息传播。对利益相关者、政策制定者以及意大利消费者的情绪/行为的系统范围审查。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug;19(2):2259398. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2259398. Epub 2023 Oct 2.