• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对美国环境保护局风险评估定义的评估。

An evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency definition of a risk assessment.

作者信息

Beck B D

机构信息

Gradient Corporation, 20 University Road, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Jan;25(1):3-5. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht577oa.

DOI:10.1191/0960327106ht577oa
PMID:16459707
Abstract

A full presentation of relevant information, including both non-adverse and beneficial effects, of chemicals is important to developing sound and balanced risk assessments. Such considerations are not new. For example, the American Thoracic Society has developed criteria for defining adverse and non-adverse pulmonary effects. Failing to allow risk assessors to even consider non-adverse and beneficial effects will discourage the use of information from developing technologies, such as genomics, and from new understandings of dose-response relationships, as reflected in the hormetic model. Failing to provide such information to risk managers potentially provides a biased perspective on risk.

摘要

全面呈现化学品的相关信息,包括非有害和有益影响,对于开展合理且平衡的风险评估至关重要。此类考量并非新鲜事物。例如,美国胸科学会已制定了定义有害和非有害肺部影响的标准。不让风险评估者考虑非有害和有益影响,将会阻碍利用诸如基因组学等新兴技术所产生的信息,以及阻碍利用剂量反应关系的新认识,如在 hormetic 模型中所体现的那样。不向风险管理者提供此类信息,可能会使他们对风险形成有偏差的看法。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the US Environmental Protection Agency definition of a risk assessment.对美国环境保护局风险评估定义的评估。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Jan;25(1):3-5. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht577oa.
2
An examination of the Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment principles and practices: a brief commentary on section 4.1.3 of the EPA March 2004 Staff Paper.对美国环境保护局风险评估原则与实践的审视:对美国环境保护局2004年3月工作人员文件第4.1.3节的简要评论
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Jan;25(1):19-21. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht580oa.
3
The case for integrating low dose, beneficial responses into US EPA risk assessments.将低剂量有益反应纳入美国环境保护局风险评估的理由。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Jan;25(1):7-10. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht578oa.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
5
Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment.对美国环境保护局风险评估定义的评论。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Jan;25(1):44-5. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht583oa.
6
Carcinogenic effects of benzene--a status update and research needs to improve risk assessments: US EPA perspective. Environmental Protection Agency.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2000 Nov;61(5-6):471-2.
7
Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment.科学与决策:推进风险评估
Risk Anal. 2010 Jul;30(7):1028-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01426.x. Epub 2010 May 20.
8
Science-policy in environmental and health risk assessment: if we cannot do without, can we do better?环境与健康风险评估中的科学政策:如果不可或缺,我们能否做得更好?
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Jan;25(1):29-43. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht582oa.
9
Endocrine modulators: risk characterization and assessment.内分泌调节剂:风险特征描述与评估
Toxicol Pathol. 2000 May-Jun;28(3):438-40. doi: 10.1177/019262330002800313.
10
Hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils: options for risk assessment and risk management.六价铬污染土壤:风险评估与风险管理选项
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Feb;25(1):43-59. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.1073.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Scenarios in Rapidly Urbanizing Cities in Developing Countries: The Case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.发展中国家快速城市化城市的城市固体废物处理方案分析:以坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 7;16(11):2035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112035.
2
The DPSIR Model for Environmental Risk Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania.《达累斯萨拉姆市固体废物环境风险评估的 DPSIR 模型》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 8;15(8):1692. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081692.