Eveillard Matthieu, de Lassence Arnaud, Lancien Evelyne, Barnaud Guilène, Ricard Jean-Damien, Joly-Guillou Marie-Laure
Service de Microbiologie et d'Hygiène, Hôpital Louis Mourier, F92700 Colombes Cedex, France.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;27(2):181-4. doi: 10.1086/500627. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
We compared the sensitivity of screening with nasal culture alone with that of a multiple-site screening method for the identification of carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission. If nasal cultures alone had been used during the 1-year study, 27.0% of carriers of methicillin-resistant S. aureus would have been missed, which corresponds to 560 theoretical isolation days. If rectal screening had not been used, 431 theoretical isolation days would have been missed, and, if axillary screening had not been used, 99 theoretical isolation days would have been missed.
我们比较了仅采用鼻腔培养筛查与多部位筛查方法在医院入院时识别耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌携带者的敏感性。在为期1年的研究中,如果仅采用鼻腔培养,27.0%的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌携带者将会漏检,这相当于560个理论隔离日。如果未采用直肠筛查,将会漏检431个理论隔离日;如果未采用腋窝筛查,将会漏检99个理论隔离日。