Suppr超能文献

与依立曲坦40毫克片剂相比,利扎曲普坦10毫克薄片剂用于偏头痛急性治疗的偏好性。

Preference for rizatriptan 10-mg wafer vs. eletriptan 40-mg tablet for acute treatment of migraine.

作者信息

Láinez M J A, Evers S, Kinge E, Allais G, Allen C, Rao N A, Massaad R, Lis K

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2006 Mar;26(3):246-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.00991.x.

Abstract

Preference is a composite, patient-oriented endpoint incorporating efficacy, tolerability, formulation, and convenience of medications. The objective of this study was to compare patient preference for rizatriptan 10-mg wafer vs. eletriptan 40-mg tablet for acute treatment of migraine. In this multicentre, open-label, two-period, crossover study, out-patients were randomly assigned to treat the first of two moderate to severe migraines with rizatriptan or eletriptan and the second with the alternate therapy. Patients completed diary assessments at baseline and up to 24 h after taking study medication. At the last visit, patients completed a psychometrically validated preference questionnaire. A total of 372 patients (mean age 38 years, 85% female) treated two migraine attacks, and 342 patients (92%) expressed a preference for treatment. Significantly more (P < or = 0.001) patients preferred rizatriptan 10-mg wafer [61.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 55.7, 66.3] to eletriptan 40-mg tablet (38.9%; 95% CI 33.7, 44.3). The most common reason given for preference of either treatment was speed of headache relief. At 2 h, 80% and 69% of patients reported that rizatriptan and eletriptan, respectively, was convenient or very convenient to take (mean convenience score 1.99 vs. 2.31, respectively; P < or = 0.001). Both triptans were well tolerated. In this head-to-head study designed to evaluate global patient preference, significantly more patients preferred the rizatriptan 10-mg wafer to the eletriptan 40-mg tablet for acute treatment of migraine. The single most important reason for preference was speed of relief, consistent with results from previous preference studies.

摘要

偏好是一个综合的、以患者为导向的终点指标,涵盖了药物的疗效、耐受性、剂型和便利性。本研究的目的是比较患者对用于偏头痛急性治疗的10毫克利扎曲普坦片与40毫克依立曲坦片的偏好。在这项多中心、开放标签、两阶段、交叉研究中,门诊患者被随机分配先用利扎曲普坦或依立曲坦治疗两次中度至重度偏头痛中的第一次,第二次用另一种疗法治疗。患者在基线时以及服用研究药物后长达24小时内完成日记评估。在最后一次就诊时,患者完成一份经过心理测量验证的偏好问卷。共有372名患者(平均年龄38岁,85%为女性)治疗了两次偏头痛发作,342名患者(92%)表达了对治疗的偏好。与40毫克依立曲坦片(38.9%;95%置信区间33.7,44.3)相比,显著更多(P≤0.001)的患者更喜欢10毫克利扎曲普坦片[61.%; 95%置信区间55.7,66.3]。对这两种治疗方法表示偏好的最常见原因是头痛缓解速度。在2小时时,分别有80%和69%的患者报告服用利扎曲普坦和依立曲坦方便或非常方便(平均便利得分分别为1.99和2.31;P≤0.001)。两种曲坦类药物耐受性均良好。在这项旨在评估总体患者偏好的直接比较研究中,对于偏头痛急性治疗,显著更多的患者更喜欢10毫克利扎曲普坦片而非40毫克依立曲坦片。偏好的唯一最重要原因是缓解速度,这与之前偏好研究的结果一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验