Suppr超能文献

服用10毫克利扎曲普坦及其他口服曲坦类药物后达到疼痛缓解和疼痛消失的时间。

Times to pain relief and pain freedom with rizatriptan 10 mg and other oral triptans.

作者信息

Ng-Mak D S, Hu X H, Chen Y, Ma L, Solomon G

机构信息

Outcomes Research and Management, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA 19486, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Jul;61(7):1091-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01400.x. Epub 2007 May 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the clinical trial setting, oral rizatriptan 10 mg has greater efficacy than other oral triptans in freedom from migraine headache pain 2 h after dosing.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective is to compare the effectiveness of rizatriptan 10 mg and other oral triptans for acute migraine attack in a naturalistic setting.

METHODS

A total of 673 patients took rizatriptan 10 mg or their usual-care oral triptans for two migraine attacks in a sequential, cross-over manner and recorded outcomes using a diary and a stopwatch. Mean and median times to pain relief (PR) and pain freedom (PF) for rizatriptan and other oral triptans were compared. The effect of rizatriptan on times to PR and PF, adjusting for potential confounding factors (treatment sequence, treatment order and use of rescue medication), was computed via a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Significantly, more patients taking rizatriptan achieved both PR and PF within 2 h after dosing than other oral triptans. Times to PR and PF were shorter with rizatriptan than with other oral triptans (median time to PR: 45 vs. 52 min, p < 0.0001; median time to PF: 100 vs. 124 min, p < 0.0001). The adjusted proportional hazard ratios (rizatriptan vs. other oral triptans) for times to PR and PF were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.22-1.44) and 1.27 (95% CI: 1.16-1.39) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The times to PR and PF in a 'naturalistic' setting were significantly shorter for patients treating a migraine attack with rizatriptan 10 mg than with other oral triptans.

摘要

背景

在临床试验环境中,口服10毫克利扎曲普坦在给药后2小时无偏头痛疼痛方面比其他口服曲坦类药物具有更高的疗效。

目的

本研究的目的是在自然环境中比较10毫克利扎曲普坦和其他口服曲坦类药物对急性偏头痛发作的有效性。

方法

共有673名患者以序贯、交叉的方式服用10毫克利扎曲普坦或他们常用的口服曲坦类药物来治疗两次偏头痛发作,并使用日记和秒表记录结果。比较了利扎曲普坦和其他口服曲坦类药物达到疼痛缓解(PR)和疼痛消失(PF)的平均时间和中位数时间。通过Cox比例风险模型计算了利扎曲普坦对达到PR和PF时间的影响,并对潜在的混杂因素(治疗顺序、治疗次序和使用急救药物)进行了调整。

结果

值得注意的是,与其他口服曲坦类药物相比,服用利扎曲普坦的患者在给药后2小时内实现PR和PF的人数明显更多。利扎曲普坦达到PR和PF的时间比其他口服曲坦类药物更短(达到PR的中位数时间:45分钟对52分钟,p<0.0001;达到PF 的中位数时间:100分钟对124分钟,p<0.0001)。达到PR和PF时间的调整比例风险比(利扎曲普坦与其他口服曲坦类药物相比)分别为1.32(95%CI:1.22-1.4)和1.27(95%CI:1.16-1.39)。

结论

在“自然”环境中,用10毫克利扎曲普坦治疗偏头痛发作的患者达到PR和PF的时间明显短于使用其他口服曲坦类药物的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35ad/1974799/6d077c936418/ijcp0061-1091-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验