Goldstein Jerome, Tiseo Paul T, Albert Kenneth S, Li Chunming, Sikes Carolyn R
San Francisco Headache Clinic, 909 Hyde Street, Suite 322, San Francisco, CA 94109, USA.
Headache. 2006 Jul-Aug;46(7):1142-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00505.x.
The objective of this open-label study was to evaluate the efficacy of switching patients who had a previous unsatisfactory response to rizatriptan to eletriptan 40 mg. Background.-The characteristics of individual migraine patients can vary tremendously and can have a significant impact on treatment outcomes. In addition, clinical experience has demonstrated that the triptans are not identical or interchangeable and that patients who respond poorly or who are dissatisfied with one agent can derive benefit by being switched to another agent within the triptan class.
Patients were eligible if they met International Headache Society criteria for migraine, with a frequency of 1 to 6 migraine attacks per month, and had documented "unsatisfactory treatment response" to rizatriptan within the past year (54% on the melt formulation; 46% on tablets). Reasons for dissatisfaction with rizatriptan (>1 could be cited) included inadequate (84%) or slow onset (50%) of pain relief, high recurrence rate (69%), and lack of improvement in associated symptoms (60%). One hundred twenty-three patients were eligible for treatment. Patients were instructed to take eletriptan 40 mg as soon as they were certain that their headache was a migraine, regardless of level of pain severity (8% treated headaches that were mild).
Headache response at 2 hours (first-attack data) was 64%. Absence of nausea (from baseline to 2 hours) increased from 50% to 78%, absence of photophobia from 30% to 72%, and absence of phonophobia from 39% to 77%. Functional response at 2 hours was 63%, with 41% of patients reporting normal functioning. Treatment with eletriptan 40 mg was associated with a 27% to 40% reduction in migraine attack-related functional impairment, as measured by the PQ-7. Recurrence rates were 36.6%. Overall, 72% of patients rated eletriptan as a "good-to-excellent" treatment, and 78% reported overall satisfaction with the degree of headache relief.
The results of this study suggest that eletriptan is an efficacious treatment option for patients who are dissatisfied with their response to rizatriptan.
本开放标签研究的目的是评估将先前使用利扎曲普坦治疗效果不佳的患者换用40毫克依立曲坦的疗效。背景:个体偏头痛患者的特征差异极大,会对治疗结果产生重大影响。此外,临床经验表明,曲坦类药物并不相同或可互换,对一种药物反应不佳或不满意的患者换用同一类别的另一种药物可能会获益。
符合国际头痛协会偏头痛标准、每月偏头痛发作1至6次且在过去一年中有使用利扎曲普坦治疗“效果不佳”记录的患者(54%使用口服崩解片剂型;46%使用片剂)符合入选条件。对利扎曲普坦不满意的原因(可列举多个)包括止痛效果不足(84%)或起效缓慢(50%)、复发率高(69%)以及相关症状无改善(60%)。123例患者符合治疗条件。患者被指导一旦确定头痛为偏头痛,无论疼痛严重程度如何(8%的治疗头痛为轻度),立即服用40毫克依立曲坦。
2小时时的头痛缓解率(首次发作数据)为64%。无恶心(从基线到2小时)从50%增至78%,无畏光从30%增至72%,无畏声从39%增至77%。2小时时的功能缓解率为63%,41%的患者报告功能正常。通过PQ-7评估,使用40毫克依立曲坦治疗使偏头痛发作相关功能损害降低了27%至40%。复发率为36.6%。总体而言,72%的患者将依立曲坦评为“良好至优秀”的治疗药物,78%的患者对头痛缓解程度总体满意。
本研究结果表明,依立曲坦是对利扎曲普坦治疗效果不满意的患者的一种有效治疗选择。