Suppr超能文献

10毫克利扎曲普坦与处方常用口服药物治疗偏头痛急性发作时达到无痛状态的时间及疼痛缓解起效时间:一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、两发作期、交叉研究。

Time to pain freedom and onset of pain relief with rizatriptan 10 mg and prescription usual-care oral medications in the acute treatment of migraine headaches: a multicenter, prospective, open-label, two-attack, crossover study.

作者信息

Bell Christopher F, Foley Kathleen A, Barlas Suna, Solomon Glen, Hu X Henry

机构信息

Outcomes Research and Management, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2006 Jun;28(6):872-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.06.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients and physicians consider rapid onset of pain relief and pain freedom among the most important attributes of migraine therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the effectiveness of rizatriptan 10 mg and usual-care oral migraine medications in everyday clinical practice settings.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label study. Adult patients treated 2 sequential migraine attacks with rizatriptan 10 mg and a usual-care prescription migraine medication in a crossover manner. Patients chose which medication to take first. They recorded the treatment outcomes using a stopwatch and a treatment diary. End points included time to pain freedom (length of time from dosing to no pain) and time to onset of pain relief (mean time to onset of pain relief and proportion of patients reporting onset of pain relief at 30 minutes), satisfaction with treatment, and medication preference. Information on adverse events was collected through the normal post-marketing reporting mechanism. Comparisons were made using the paired t test and McNemar test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A mixed model, accounting for multiple observations per patient, was fitted for the time to pain freedom, controlling for age, sex, treatment period, medication, and headache severity.

RESULTS

Of 2346 enrolled patients, 1489 treated 2 migraines in a crossover manner and were included in the analysis (86.8% women, 13.2% men; mean age, 41.7 years). A majority of patients (80.6%) treated both migraines with oral triptans. The most commonly used nontriptans were NSAIDs (5.4%), butalbital-containing combinations (4.3%), and isometheptene (3.4%). Over-the-counter medications were used by 22.3% of patients during rizatriptan-treated attacks and by 28.9% of patients during attacks treated with usual-care medications. The mean time to pain freedom was significantly shorter when an attack was treated with rizatriptan compared with usual-care medications (222 vs 298 minutes, respectively; P<0.001), and the onset of pain relief was significantly more rapid (85 vs 107 minutes; P=0.003), with significant differences noted as early as 15 minutes after dosing (P<0.001). The findings remained similar after adjustment for potential confounding factors. No significant sequence effect was detected. Significantly more patients reported being very satisfied or satisfied with rizatriptan compared with usual-care medications (65.4% vs 57.7%; P<0.001) and preferred rizatriptan (58.0% vs 42.0%; P<0.001). One female patient reported having hives and itchy skin the day after taking rizatriptan; the symptoms subsided after treatment with methylprednisolone.

CONCLUSIONS

In this selected population, treatment of a migraine attack with rizatriptan 10 mg was associated with a faster time to pain freedom and onset of pain relief compared with treatment with usual-care oral migraine medications. Patients reported greater satisfaction with and preference for rizatriptan.

摘要

背景

患者和医生认为快速缓解疼痛和达到无痛状态是偏头痛治疗最重要的特性。

目的

本研究比较了10毫克利扎曲普坦与日常临床实践中常规护理口服偏头痛药物的疗效。

方法

这是一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签研究。成年患者以交叉方式先后用10毫克利扎曲普坦和常规护理处方偏头痛药物治疗2次偏头痛发作。患者选择先服用哪种药物。他们使用秒表和治疗日记记录治疗结果。终点包括达到无痛状态的时间(从给药到无痛的时长)、疼痛缓解开始的时间(疼痛缓解开始的平均时间以及在30分钟时报告疼痛缓解的患者比例)、对治疗的满意度以及药物偏好。通过正常的上市后报告机制收集不良事件信息。分别使用配对t检验和McNemar检验对连续变量和分类变量进行比较。针对达到无痛状态的时间拟合了一个混合模型,该模型考虑了每位患者的多次观察结果,并对年龄、性别、治疗期、药物和头痛严重程度进行了控制。

结果

在2346名登记患者中,1489名以交叉方式治疗了2次偏头痛并纳入分析(女性86.8%,男性13.2%;平均年龄41.7岁)。大多数患者(80.6%)用口服曲坦类药物治疗了2次偏头痛。最常用的非曲坦类药物是非甾体抗炎药(5.4%)、含布他比妥的复方制剂(4.3%)和异美汀(3.4%)。22.3%的患者在利扎曲普坦治疗的发作期间使用了非处方药物,28.9%的患者在常规护理药物治疗的发作期间使用了非处方药物。与常规护理药物相比,用利扎曲普坦治疗发作时达到无痛状态的平均时间显著更短(分别为222分钟和298分钟;P<0.001),疼痛缓解开始得也显著更快(85分钟和107分钟;P=0.003),给药后15分钟就出现了显著差异(P<0.001)。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,研究结果仍然相似。未检测到显著的顺序效应。与常规护理药物相比,报告对利扎曲普坦非常满意或满意的患者显著更多(65.4%对57.7%;P<0.001),且更倾向于利扎曲普坦(58.0%对42.0%;P<0.001)。一名女性患者在服用利扎曲普坦后第二天报告出现荨麻疹和皮肤瘙痒;用甲基泼尼松龙治疗后症状消退。

结论

在这个特定人群中,与常规护理口服偏头痛药物治疗相比,用10毫克利扎曲普坦治疗偏头痛发作可更快达到无痛状态且疼痛缓解开始得更早。患者对利扎曲普坦的满意度更高且更倾向于使用它。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验